The defence of Diminished responsibility can be raised to a charge of murder.
If successful the defence will reduce the charge to voluntary manslaughter.
The defence is set out in s2HomicideAct of 1957 as amended by the s52 Coroners and Justice Act 2009.
The key element of the defence is that the defendantneeds to be suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning (Byrne).
Abnormality of mental functioning
Defined as 'a state of mind so different from that of an ordinary human being that the reasonable man would term it as abnormal'. (Byrne).
This abnormality must arise from a recognised medical condition.
Conditions have been confirmed by cases and include Battered spouse syndrome (Aluwahlia), depression, psychotic disorders (Byrne), PMT (English), post natal depression (Reynolds), alcohol dependency syndrome (Wood).
Aluwahlia
Battered spouse syndrome
Byrne
Psychotic disorders
English
PMT
Reynolds
Post nataldepression
Wood
Alcoholdependency syndrome
The abnormality must substantially impair the defendants responsibility to do one of the 3 things in 1(a).
These are to understand the nature of their conduct, to form a rational judgement or to exercise self control.
The 3 things in 1(a)
To understand the nature of their conduct
To form a rational judgement
To exerciseself control
The term substantial has been confirmed by Golds to not mean total or trivial or minimal but something in between - this is a question of degree for the jury.
These elements then provide an explanation for the defendants conduct.
If relevant:
The relevance of intoxication and diminished responsibility have been confirmed in Gittens and Dietschmann - the jury must ignore the intoxication and make a decision only on the abnormality of the mind - would the defendant have still carried out their actions only based on the abnormality?
If relevant:
The case of Wood deals with Alcohol dependent syndrome, this is a recognised medical condition and therefore can be taken into account.