There is no definition in the Land Registration Act for 'actual occupation'.
It is up to the courts and case law to make a decision as to what constitutes actual occupation.
The courts take a somewhat flexible approach to the issue of actual occupation and are relatively reluctant to make a strict determination as to its meaning.
The leading authority in this area is the case of Williams and Glyn's Bank v Boland.
Lord Wilberforce stated that the words 'actual occupation' were 'ordinary words of plain English' which 'should... be interpreted as such.'
It should not have any special legal interpretation and is therefore a question of fact.
Abbey National v Cann
The idea of actual occupation was applied to the facts of the case and it was held it could not be claimed that there was actual occupation.
Mallory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes (UK) Ltd
Illustrate circumstances where actual occupation may be impossible do to the property being uninhabitable.
Arden LJ states that in such a case 'residence is not required, but there must be some physical presence, with some degree of permanence and continuity.'