Evaluating the humanistic approach: Not reductionist (with counterpoint)
- A strength is that the approach rejects attempts to break up behaviour and experience into smaller components.
- Behaviourists explain human and animal learning n terms of simple stimulus-response connections. Cognitive psychologists see human beings as little more than information-processing machines. Biological psychologists reduce behaviour down to simple physiological processes and Freud described the personality as conflict between the Id, Ego and Superego. Contrastingly, the humanistic approach advocates holism the idea that subjective experience can only be understood by considering the whole person.
- This approach may have more validity than its alternatives by considering meaningful human behaviour within its real-world context.
- Counterpoint: Despite this, reductionist approaches are often more scientific than holistic approaches. This is because the idea of science is the experiment, and experiments reduce behaviour to independent and dependent variables.
- One issue with humanistic psychology is that, unlike behaviourism, there are relatively few concepts that can be broken down to single variables and measured.
- This means that humanistic psychology in general is short on empirical evidence to support it's claims.