The offence of GrossNegligent Manslaughter follows 4 key elements as laid down in the case of Adomako.
The D must owe the V a Duty of Care (Adomako)
Ordinary principles of negligence in tort apply as set out in Caparo V Dickman.
Wacker
The fact V was party to an illegal act is not relevant.
Singh, Litchfield
Duty can be contractual.
Stone and Dobinson
A duty can arise because of a relationship.
Evans
Duty can arise where D creates a state of affairs. Need to call for medical help.
2. There must be a Breach of Duty which causes the death. Can be an act or omission, causation rules apply.
3. The breach must be 'Gross'.
Bateman
Gross is defined as:
'the negligence of the accused went beyond a mere matter of compensation between subjects and showed such disregard for the life and safety of others as to amount to a crime'.
Adomako
Confirmed the gross test and stressed it is a matter for the jury to decide.
4. There must be a Risk of Death.
Adomako
There must be a risk of death to the victim because of the breach.
Mirsa
The point of law in Adomako was confirmed in this case - there must be a risk of death to find the defendant guilty.