the psychological and cultural differences between males and females in attitudes, behaviours, and roles. a person in terms of their degree of masculinity and femininity.
sex definition
biological fact of being a man or a woman - the biological differences between males and females.
sex-role stereotypes
a set of beliefs and preconceived ideas about what is expected or appropriate for males and females in a given society
Imperato-McGinley et al (1974)- Batista boys
AO1: unactive hormones only released during puberty caused 4 girls to 'change' sex by growing penises, all the 'girls' felt male before the change
AO2: suggests gender is biological
AO3: (-)very unique case (lacks population validity), (-) culturally biased
Madhura Ingalhalikar et al (2004)
AO1: used brain scanning techniques on 949 brains to test sex role stereotypes, finding females are better at multitasking (etc)
AO2: suggests gender is fixed (nature) and that gender stereotypes are based on sex
AO3: (+) generalisable, (+) replicable, (-) lack of detail as to why
The case of Sasha
AO1: 5-year-old boy whose parents raised him as genderneutral, his gender kept a secret from everyone
AO2: suggests gender is fluid and can be decided (nurture)
AO3: (-) case study, (-) unethical - mother faced issues via backlash
Androgyny
displaying a balance of masculine and feminine traits in ones personality
Sandra Bem (1974)
AO1: suggested high androgyny to be associated with psychological well-being, composed the BSRI - respondents rate themselves on the level of truth that a sex-stereotypical word applies to them (20 feminine, masculine and neutral in total)
AO2: high masculine and low feminine = masculine, low masculine and high feminine = feminine, high masculine and high feminine = androgynous, low masculine and low feminine = undifferentiated
AO3: (+) reliable and replicable, (-) quantitative, (-) no insight to degree of androgyny, (-) investigator effects
chromosomes
found in the nucleus of living cells and carrying information in the form of genes, the 23rd pair determining biological sex
hormones
biochemical substances that circulate in the bloodstream and only affect target organs
Hines (1994)
AO1: studied children between the ages of 3 and 8 with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (excess prenatal exposure to testosterone)
AO2: only minor differences found between girls with CAH and the control group, limits the biological explanation for gender
Deady et al (2006)
AO1: investigated 25 child-free women and asked them about their attitudes towards children, measured the women's testosterone levels
AO2: women with higher testosterone levels had lower maternal drives
AO3: supports the biological explanation for gender
Money et al (1972) - David Reimer
AO1: twin boys born, one had his penis turned into a vagina after a botched circumcision, parents continued to raise him as a girl
AO2: Reimer faced many mental health issues - which were resolved after he discovered he was a male and 'transitioned' back
AO3: (-) UNETHICAL, supports the biological explanation for gender
limitations of the biological explanation for gender
reductionist, animal studies tend to be difficult to generalise to humans
Klinefelter's syndrome
chromosomal pattern: XXY
physical characteristics: reduced body hair, breast development (gynecomastia) , long limbs, susceptible to breast cancer
psychological characteristics: poorly developed language skills, lack of interest in sexual activities, shyness, poor handling of stress
who it affects: 1 in 600 men
Turner's syndrome
chromosomal pattern: X0
physical characteristics: no menstrual cycle, webbed neck, low hip-to-waist ratio, low set ears
psychological characteristics: higher than average reading ability, socially immature, struggle relating to peers
who it affects: 1 in 5000 women
evaluation of atypical sex chromosomes
(+) research has allowed for early intervention and hormone treatments, (-) lacks population validity, (-) research ignores individual differences, (-) reductionist
Lawrence Kohlberg (1966)
a cognitive-developmental theory of gender that is based on the idea that a child's understanding of gender becomes more sophisticated with age - due to biological maturation
gender identity stage (Kohlberg)
understanding of gender mainly revolves around labels, at the age of two children can correctly identify themselves as male or female, at three they are able to label others
gender stability stage (Kohlberg)
children begin to realise that people remain the same gender throughout their lives at around four years of age, they struggle to comprehend gender when people do not follow sex role stereotypes
gender constancy stage (Kohlberg)
around the age of six children recognise gender remains constant across time and situations - no longer fooled by outwards appearance
evaluation of Kohlberg'sgender identity theory
(+)Damon1977, (+)Slaby and Frey1975, (-) supporting research relies on unsatisfactory methods to asses gender constancy, (-) different degrees of gender constancy
Damon (1977)
concluded that young children have no concept of gender-appropriate behaviour and that older children have a more developed sense of gender
Slaby and Frey (1975)
children who scored highly on both gender stability and constancy showed the greatest interest in same-sex models and therefore attention to gender-appropriate behaviour
Carol Martin and Charles Halverson (1981)
cognitive-developmental theory which argues that children's understanding of gender changes with age
gender schema
an organised set of beliefs and expectations related to gender that are derived from experience, such schemas guide a person's understanding of their gender and stereotypically gender appropriate behaviour
in-groups vs out-groups within children
children tend to have a better understanding of the schema that are appropriate to their in-group, when they grow up they develop an elaborate schema for both genders
evaluation for gender schema theory
(-) low temporal validity, (-) relies on nuclear families, (-) doesn't explain why some children reject in-group (deterministic), (+) Bradbard et al (1986), (+) Martin and Little (1990)
Martin and Little (1990)
tested children (3-5 years old) on different stages of Kohlberg's gender identity theory, and clothing and toy preferences - they found that children only require gender identity for preferences and knowledge to be influenced
Bradbard et al (1986)
when 4-9 year olds were told certain neutral items were boy or girl items they took greater interest for ingroup labelled toys
Oedipus complex
how boys resolve their love for their moths and feelings of rivalry towards their fathers
Electra complex
girls resolving their love for their fathers and feelings of rivalry towards their mothers
the psychodynamic explanation of gender development
freud stated that children who haven't reached the phallic stage haven't developed a gender identity and are 'bisexual' in the sense that they are neither masculine nor feminine
the focus of please in the phallic stage is the genitals therefore causing the children to undergo the Oedipus/Electra complex
Carl Jung suggested that girls identify with their mothers as a result of accepting that they will never have a penis (penis envy)
evaluation of the psychodynamic explanation for gender development
(-) lack of research support/evidence, (-) androcentric, (-) lacks temporal validity, (-) relies heavily on nuclear families, (-) unscientific
Social Learning theory as an explanation for gender identity
suggests that the source of information is social and that gender development results from observational learning from social agents who model and reinforce gender roles
gender in the west vs the east
West= gender expression is more fluid
East= more rigid traditional gender roles
Mead (1935)
studied gender roles and behaviour in three different tribal societies living close to each other in Papa New Guinea:
Arapesh: put a high value on cooperation, all children raised to be gentle, child-bearing was by both parents
Mundugmor: hated the whole idea of pregnancy and were more quarrelsome
Tchambuli: men were regarded as emotional and unfit for leadership while women took care of serious matters.
All tribes sent the men to war.
Williams and Best (1990)
tested 2800 students in 30 different countries using a 300-item adjective checklist, participants were asked to decide whether the adjectives corresponded to men or women. overall women were seen as more nurturant whilst males more aggressive (universal agreement on stereotypes about gender)
Williams et al (1960s)
AO1: found that there is a higher level of gender-stereotypical expression in children who have access to multiple TV channels as opposed to children with no TV or only one channel
AO2: suggests that media influences children to have a more exaggerated expression of gender
AO3: (-) sample of only Canadian children (ethnocentric), (-) lacks temporal validity, (-) pseudoscientific, (-) not replicable
gender identity disorder
a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and gender identity, it affects males more than females and an estimated 1 in 11000 have the condition