'He who goes on land without invitation of any sort and who's presence is either unknown to the occupier, or if known, is practically objected to' per Lord Dunedin
Keown
D not liable as the injury was not caused by the state of the premises but the claimants' dangerous activities.
Revill v Newbery
The courts ruled that burglars have to be protected as well or else that would make them outlaws
Donoghue v Folkston Properties
no DOC is owed to tresspassers as the occupier had no reasonable grounds to believe anyone would be in the vicinty of danger
White v St Albans DC
he knew about the danger but D had no reason to believe this man would be in the vicinity
Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council
signs forbidding swimming were enough to create a duty but D was liable but damages were reduced
