acknowledges biological, psychological and social factors in the development of schizophrenia
interactionist approach
diathesis stress model
states that a vulnerability and stress trigger are needed to develop the condition.
maybe one or more factors of vulnerability but the onset is triggered by stress
meehl's model (1962)
original model argued the vulnerability was purely genetic and result of a schizogene. If the person doesn't have the gene then no amount of stress can trigger the illness
modern understanding of diathesis stress model
clear that there may be a genetic vulnerability for developing schizophrenia but there isnt a single schizogene
modern views include other factors such as psychological trauma
trauma becomes the diathesis rather than stressor
read (2011)
proposed a neurodevelopment model in which early trauma alters the development of the brain
this can be early child abuse
the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal system can become over active making a person much more vulnerable to stress later on
cannabis
triggering an episode of schizophrenia as it becomes the stressor
can increase risk by up to 7x as it interferes with the dopamine system
not everyone who smokes cannabis develops schizophrenia so there must be more than one vulnerability factor
support for the role of vulnerability and triggers
tienari (2004)
investigated combination of genetic vulnerability and parenting style (children adopted from Finnish mothers w/ schizophrenia)
Adoptive parents addressed the child rearing style characterised by high levels of criticism and conflict increased risk of developing schizophrenia
BUT only children with a genetic vulnerability
support for combining treatments
patients seem to fare much better when you combine treatments
you have to adopt an interactionist approach if you want to combine treatments
original diathesis stress model is oversimplified(weakness)
there are multiple genes that leave someone vulnerable to developing schizophrenia
stress comes in different forms not just dysfunctional parenting
we dont actually know how the diathesis stress model works(weakness)
we don't fully know how the mechanisms by which symptoms of schizophrenia appear ad how both vulnerability and stress produce them
the treatment-causation fallacy (weakness)
combination of treatment makes a logical fit but it doesnt mean the interactionist approach is correct
doesnt mean theres a biological cause, could be environmental
treating schizophrenia
acknowledges both biological and psychological factors
-uses antipsychotic drugs combined with CBT
in britain
its common to use both forms of treatment and have more freely adopted an interactionist approach
in america
more conflict between biological and psychological models
slower rate in adopting interactionist approach
drugs are used more without CBT
unusual to treat schizophrenia without medication; less success rate on their own (30%)
support for combining treatments: tarrier (2004)
215 patients allocated to conditions:
medication + supportive counselling
medication + CBT
control group (medication on its own)
1 & 2 showed lower levels of symptoms. shows advantage to adopting an interactionist approach