theories and have to work out ways to test their theories, this is why research is needed
Lab experiments...
are ones that are conducted in a highly controlled, sometimes artificial environment
Lab experiments do not
always happen in a laboratory eg in a classroom
In a lab experiment, the researcher decides
Where it happens, when it happens, who participates, what they do and control what to control eg situational factors like temp.
In a lab experiment, there is an
independent (the cause) and dependant (the effect) measured
Psychologists carry out lab experiments on
humans called participants
Field experiments is
carried out in an natural environment
Field experiments IVs are
still manipulated but is done in an environment which is typical to the behaviour being studies
In field experiments,
participants are not aware they are being studied
Natural experiments are carried out
in a natural environment or a lab.
Natural experiments IVs
are not directly manipulated instead it is naturally occuring
In Natural experiments researchers
take advantage of changes to investigate
Quasi experiments are carried out
in a natural environment or a lab
Quasi IVs are
not manipulated, it simply exists
Quasi IVs are
based on existing differences between people
Lab experiments summary
Controlled. IV manipulated. Participants aware
Field experiment summary
Natural environment. IV manipulated. Participants not aware.
Natural experiment summary
Natural or Lab. IV naturally occurring.
Quasi experiment summary
Lab or natural. IV is based on existing differences
Evaluating methods
need to think about what practical, theoretical, or ethical issues may arise when using these methods.
Evaluating methods - practical
time, costs etc
Evaluating methods - ethical
informed consent, confidentiality, right to withdraw etc
Evaluating methods - Theoretical
Validity, reliability
Internal Reliability is
a measure of consistency within itself, such as whether the different questions in a questionnaire are all measuring the same thing
External reliability is
assuring consistency when different measures of the same thing are compared. Can be improved using standardised procedures
Internal Validity is
extent to which the observed effect was due to experimental manipulation (what you are studying) rather than other factors
External validity is
the extent to which research findings can be generalised beyond research; to other settings and over time
Lab experiments strengths
Well controlled. Extraneous Variables minimised, thus higher internal validity. Can be easily replicated, demonstrating external validity
Lab experiment weaknesses
Artificial, a contrived situation- participants may know they're being studied, materials may lack mundane realism. environment unfamiliar. Therefore participants ay not behave naturally leading to ecological validity.
Field experiment strengths
Less artificial, usually higher ecological validity. Usually higher mundane validity. Participants not aware they be studied.
Field experiment weaknesses
Less control of extraneous variables, reduces internal validity. More time consuming and expensive.
Natural experiment strengths
Allows research where IV can't be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons. Enables psychologist to study real problems such as the effects of disaster on health.
Natural experiments weaknesses
Cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV not directly manipulated. Random allocation not possible, therefore there may be confounding variables that cannot be controlled, a threat to internal validity.
Quasi experiment strengths
Allows comparison between types of people.
Quasi experiments weaknesses
Can only be used where conditions vary naturally. Participants may be aware of being studied, thus reducing internal validity. DV may be a fairly artificial task, reducing ecological validity.