Save
...
Philosophy of Religion
Evil and Suffering
The Soul Making Theodicy
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Ephie
Visit profile
Cards (18)
John Hick
1922-
2012
Philosopher of
religion
and
theologian
Taught in the
US
for most of his career
Theodicy- a
philosophical
defence of God's goodness, power and even existence in the face of the reality of
evil
Hick
rejects Augustinian views:
Natural evil
exists because of the fall
Women are the "
devil's gateway
"
Women allowed
moral evil
into the world
Hick
called Augustinian views "utterly unacceptable" and "a product of religious imagination"
Hick
liked
Irenaeus's
views
Humanity did not fall from
perfection
, but were rather created as imperfect beings with the ability to become
children
of God
Hick
believed that just as children learn to love their father, humans learn to love
God
God
does not
shield
humans, similar to how parents do not shield their children
God
creates humans and then lets them
develop character
As children do, the human race will
mature
and will respond with love to
God
Hick
says "
God
is infinitely persuasive, every individual will be brought into a moral and spiritual relationship with God"
A
loving
father would not put his children in
hell
People need
free will
to choose God
Epistemic
distance
A distance of
knowledge
People would lose their freedom if they knew for certain that there was a
God
Weaknesses
Does not justify
animal suffering
There are
pointless
evils in this world
It does not justify the
worst
evils
Hick's response to animal suffering
Animals do not fear
death
Pain is a
warning
sign to animals, it's an
evolutionary mechanism
Hick's
response to pointless evils
We cannot know everything
If we knew everything, we would not have fear nor hope
Hick's response to the worst evils
There is always a "
worst
" evil
Removing one
worst
evil would just lead to another
developing
More evil removed=
less
freedom
Strengths
Fits with
scientific knowledge
and
biblical criticism
Concept of God as a "
fellow sufferer
"
No conflict between
omnibenevolence
and
evil