Liberals reject Conservative and Catholic ideals that human nature is flawed and humankind is not capable of improvement
Reformation led to the Enlightenment in the 17th-18th century
Enlightenment sought to translate religious ideas of individualism into political and secular spheres. Humans are capable of self improvement and rational
Humans reach rational conclusions based on tolerance, reasoned arguments and philosophical considerations
Individuals pursue self interests and are naturally competitive but sensitive to each other
Classical - favour negative freedoms -> J.S. Mill
Classical - Locke said prior to the state humans lived in a state of nature underpinned by natural law
Modern - support positive and negative freedoms
Modern - less optimistic about human nature, believe human potential should be nurtured by education and the active creation of a free, progressive society
Modern - Wollstonecraft said men and women are equally rational and humans were created to perfect their nature as rational and moral beings
Modern - J.S. Mill said humans are capable of improvement, they are not fixed
Modern - Rawls said humans can be selfish and value individual freedom but are sympathetic to the less fortunate
Modern - Friedan said humans should be free to seek control over their own lives and the realisation of their potential
Modern - Friedan said human nature did not condemn women to underachievement