Save
...
Section B
Murder
2. Causation
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Autumn B116
Visit profile
Cards (10)
D’s act or
omission
must have caused V’s
death
Factual
causation is proven using the
But For
test as in R v
Pagett
Legal causation is proven using the operative and substantial test as in R v
Smith
where D must be a
significant
cause.
The chain of causation can be broken by new
intervening
acts if they are
unreasonsable
and
unforeseeable.
Intervening acts:
Acts of a
third
party
Acts of the
victim
Acts of
God
Acts of a
third
party
R v
Pagett
Acts of the
victim
R v
Williams
(did break chain)
R v
Roberts
(did not break chain)
Acts of
God
Lightning, gust of wind, hurricane, etc.
Acts of
third
party medics will break the chain if they’re
unreasonable
,
unforeseeable
AND
palpably
wrong.
Hidden vulnerabilities will not break the chain of
causation.
This is known as the
Thin
Skull Rule as in R v
Blaue.