Models Of Memory

Cards (34)

  • Who created the Multi-Store Model of memory?
    Atkinson and Shiffrin- 1968
  • what is the multi-store model of memory?
    it is the representation of how our memories is structured; it is a linear model with three stores
  • what are the three key stages in the multi-store Model of memory
    -> sensory register
    -> short term memory
    -> long term memory
  • describe features the sensory register?
    -> it is the first part of our memory where info is held
    -> environmental stimuli (see, taste, smell, hear, feelings) are stored here
    -> the capacity register of sensory register is relatively large, and it constantly receives info
    -> duration of this store is very brief(less than a second)
    -> it contains to main stores: -iconic codes (visual)
    -echoic codes(acoustically-listen)
  • describe why attention is important in the multi-store model
    -> it is the first part of remembering something-so it can be transferred into our STM
    -> the capacity of STM is limited to 15-30 secs, therefore maintenance rehearsal is vital
  • What is it called when info disappears from STM if new info enters it?
    displacement
  • how do we use info from our LTM
    through retrieval- transfers info from our LTM to STM
    -> retrieval and rehearsal is a fluid process- we ,ay draw something out of our LTM to remember it when we need it, but then we can let it go back to our LTM after use
  • Who created the working memory model?
    Baddeley and Hitch (1974)
  • why was the multi-store model criticised
    -> for over-simplifying the STM and LTM as a single store system.
  • what is the working memory model?
    it was developed by Baddeley and Hitch which focuses specifically on the workings short-term memory
  • in the working memory model, how many limited capacity stores is it composed of, name them?
    ->3
    ->central executive- has two slave stores
    ->articulatory-phonological loop
    -> visuo-spatial keyboard
  • explain the central executive
    it manages attention, and controls info from the two slave stores- APL and VSS
  • explain the articulatory-phonological loop
    it temporarily retains language based info, consists of:
    -> an articulatory rehearsal process- ('inner voice') of language, including any language presented visually to convert to a phonological state in the
    ->phonological store-('inner ear'), which holds auditory speech info and order in which it was heard (or any visually-presented language converted by the articulatory process)
  • explain the visuo-spatial sketchpad
    temporarily retains visual and spatial info
  • where did the three store STM stem from
    it stemmed from a research using a 'dual-task technique'/ 'interference tasks' whereby performance is measured as participants perform two tasks simultaneously
  • what is the episodic buffer
    it facilitates communication between the central executive and long term memory
  • give an observation provided evidence that suggests different limited capacity STM stores process different types of memory ?
    >if one store is utilised for both tasks, then task performance is poorer than when they are completed separately, due to the store's limited capacity
    ->e.g repeating "the the the" aloud and reading some text silently would use the APL for both tasks slowing performance >if the tasks require different stores, performance would be unaffected when performing them simultaneously
  • give another observation that provides evidence that different limited capacity store STM process different types of memory
    >if the tasks require different stores, performance would be unaffected when performing them simultaneously
    -> e.g repeating "the the the" aloud whilst performing a reasoning task (requires attention, i.e the central executive, or whilst following a mobile stimulus with your eyes (using the visuo-spatial sketchpad)
  • give a supporting evidence for the WMM
    ->Baddeley et al (1975)
    ->the aim was to investigate the existence of the phonological loop in STM
    ->procedure: participants saw everyday words displayed very quickly one after the other, they were then asked to write the words seen in serial order (the same order as on the list)
    ->condition 1: list contained five one-syllable English words
    ->conditions 2: the list contained five polysyllabic english words
  • what were the findings and conclusions from the experiment carried out to investigate the existence of the phonological loop?

    ->from analysing several trials Baddeley found participants recalled shorter, one syllable words much better than the polysyllabic words-the word length effect
    -> conclusion: the phonological loop has a role in the capacity of STM
    ->the amount you can hold in your STM is determined by the length of time it takes to say the words NOT the number of items
    ->it seems that the phonological loop holds the amount of info that you can say in 2 seconds
  • another supporting evidence of the WMM
    ->Shallice and Warrington (1970)-evidence for different components
    ->the KF case study supports the WMM, KF suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident that damaged his short-term memory
    ->KF's impairment was mainly for verbal info (phonological loop was affected)-his memory for visual info was largely unaffected
  • what were the findings of this case study that supports the idea that the STM has different components/stores?

    ->it supports the WMM because it suggests that there is more than one store that process different types of info
    ->his phonological loop was damaged meaning he cannot remember what was said to him
    ->his VSS was intact cause anything he sees gets transferred to his LTM
  • are there any problems with using case studies and lab experiments in psychology?
    ->generalisation- the KF case study was based on one person, this therefore cannot speak on everyone due to individual differences
    ->using lab experiments feels like an artificial setting, with unrealistic tasks
  • what is a strength of the WMM and give an example

    ->it has supporting evidence
    ->e.g Baddeley and Hitch found that participants remembered one syllable words much better than polysyllabic words
  • why is the WMM having supporting evidence a strength?

    ->it supports the existence of the phonological loop and consequently the idea that the STM has more than one store
  • what is another strength of the WMM? give an example

    ->there is supporting evidence for the WMM from brain damaged patients
    ->this is because KF suffered brain damage from a motorcycle accident that damaged his short-term memory.
    ->KF'S impairment was mainly for verbal info-his memory for visual info wasn't affected
  • why is the supporting evidence from the brain damaged patient a strength?
    ->patient KF struggled to recall separate types of sensory info, this supports the idea for separate stores within the STM.
    ->this therefore, supports the WMM and increases it's validity
  • what is a weakness of the WMM?, give an example.

    ->the central executive isn't very well explained
    ->Baddeley (2003) stated that the central executive is the most important but least understood part of the working memoryu
  • why is the central executive not being well explained in the WMM a weakness 

    this decreases the validity of the working memory model as we don't fully understand how it works
  • what is a strength of the MSM (multi-store model)

    ->there is supporting evidence
    ->e.g. is the case of Clive Wearing, he suffered damage to his memory following an illness and was found to have an STM duration of 7 seconds
    ->rather than the typical 18-30 seconds
    ->new info was lost from Clive's STM very quickly, and he was unable to transfer it to his LTM
  • why is the supporting evidence from Clive Wearing a strength?

    his case supports the MSM because his situation implies that memory is indeed linear and requires transferring from the STM to LTM
  • what is the limitation of the MSM?

    ->there is contradictory evidence for the MSM
    ->an example is Patient KF, injured in a motorbike accident, following his accident, his LTM was normal (able to transfer and make new LTMs)
    ->his STM was however so damaged, that he could only remember 2 items/'chunks' from lists that were read to him
    ->instead of the usual 7+/-2 items
  • why is the contradictory evidence from Patient KF a limitation?

    it is a limitation of the MSM because he could make new long-term memories without having to pass through his STM-it implies that memory isn't linear, suggesting that this model is flawed
  • what is the alternative theory of how memory works

    ->the WMM suggests that there are multiple stores within the STM which process info and are responsible for different things, e.g auditory/visual/spatial info