Lothar of Sengi became Pope InnocentIII in January 8th 1198
His first immediate actions were to intervene in the succession of the HolyRomanEmpire
However, his main goal was to personally lead a crusade
In August1198, Innocent III issued PostMiserable - a papal bull which outlined the organisation of the Fourth Crusade
How did Innocent III attract crusaders
In PostMiserable, he offered the crusaders a plenaryindulgence in 3 forms
1 = A self funding crusader
2 = A non-crusader whose journey was funded by someone else
3 = A non-crusader who paid for someone else to go
Innocent III also wiped out old church doctrine with the permission of a crusader's wife no longer needed
How did Innocent III maximise recruitment
He created the businessofthecross in 1198, which ensured a named individual was responsible for different areas under the control of Rome
He also used preachers like Fulk of Neuilly and Abbot Martin of Pairis
He sent Papal Legates, Peter of Capuano to establish a truce between Richard I and Philip II so they could lead the crusade. He had Soffredo contact Venice for the practical arrangements to Outremer
How did Innocent III ensure success
He made crusaders commit themselves to 2 years of service to fulfil their vow
He dispatched PapalLegates to Outremer in advance for the 4th crusade
He built upon the system of the SaladinTithe, while also:
Council of Dijon 1198 - Encouraged bishops to give 1/30th
31st December 1199 - Gravesorientalis terrae, 1/40th tax on church
Chests ordered in churches and donators would recieve indulgences
Leadership problems with the Crusade
Peter of Capuano failed to impress Richard I, as he made him sign a 5 year treaty with Philip II and release Bishop Philip of Beauvais, who Richard hated. However, Richard's full support was weakened when he died in April1199
Philip II had lots of political measures in front of him, and when demanded by Peter of Capuano to install his lawful wife, Ingeborg of Denmark back, he refused
The only other candidate was Philip of Swabia, the German Holy Roman Empire, but Innocent III had disputed his claim
Recruitment problems in the crusade
The preachers that he appointed failed to stir up sufficient recruits. Eg - Fulk of Neuilly's reputation was tarnished when he was rumoured to be involved in embezzling funds
Innocent failed to recognise the modern chivalric values - knights would now only follow their overlord, not fight as a chance to show off
He was worried in November1199 when Markwald threatend the papal state while Innocent was regent of the Holy Roman Empire - he offered plenary indulgences to those who fought against him, diverting recruits away from the crusade
Logistical issues in the crusade
Innocent's tax in 1199 of 1/40th of the church began the topic of conversation that crusaders should fund their own crusade
Innocent only gave the crusaders 6 months, March 1199, not enough time to sort the recruitment, leadership decision making and transportation arrangement
What were the 3 key issues Innocent could not prevent
November 1202 = Crusader's attack Christian city of Zara on behalf of the Venetians
Summer 1203 = Crusaders diverted to Constantinople to reclaim the city for Prince Alexius
April & May 1204 = Crusaders attacked Constantinople and established Romania
Failure to influence Zara campaign
Innocent III threatened the crusaders with excommunication
His Papal Legate, Peter of Capuano agreed instead of disprove, out of fear the crusaders would disintegrate
The Papal Letter reached leadership in November 1202, but they supressed it, showing Innocent's lack of impotence