an extension of literal rule. if the literal rule will produce an absurd result that parliament didn't intend, the judge may alter words in the statute to produce a satisfactoryresult
which case did the golden rule originate from?
becke v smith
what is the narrowgolden rule?
where a word has more than one meaning, the judge may pick the meaning that makes sense
what did lordreid say about the narrow rule in jones v dpp?
"if words are capable of more than one meaning, then you can choose between these meanings, but beyond this you cannotgo"
r v allen (narrow golden)
"marry" can mean legally or a ceremony of marriage
r v maginnis (narrow golden)
undecided whether "supply" could be applied to redelivery of goods by depositee to depositer, D was found guilty under s.5(3) of the misuse of drugs act 1971
what is the widergoldenapproach?
if a word with oneclearmeaning would lead to a repugnant situation, the judge can modify it to avoid this
adler v george (wider golden)
"vicinity of" was modified to include prohibitedplaceitself (s.3 of official secrets act 1920), D was found guilty because he was in the building
re sigsworth (wider golden)
"issue", regarding next of kin, could not inherit the will if they murdered the deceased