protagonist

• BP2: 1 (topic)?


  • texts centre on protagonists symbolising resistance, providing audiences with a critical lens to examine society
  • MCs embody distance forms that reflect context
• BP2 THT: 2?

  • criticises patriarchy through MC, highlighting how individuals can become complicit in their own oppression
  • root in struggle to retain control over identity in regime that commodifies women as reproductive vessels
  • emblematic of1970s-1980s second-wave feminism in fight for bodily autonomy
• BP2 THT: 3?


  • quiet acts of defiance - not revealing name - demonstrate resistance to attempts of erasing and controlling
  • preservation of self aligns with second-wave values and a common convention
• BP2 THT: 4 (evidence)?


  • remains passive, reflecting limited options for rebellion in totalitarian context
  • "we lived, as usual, by ignoring. Ignoring ins't the some as ignorance, you have to work at it" (Atwood)
  • acknowledgment fortifies MCs understanding and MA's warning - passive acceptance and inaction allowed regime to gain control
• BP2: 5 (link)?


  • Offred confined to internal defiance, Furiosa takes direct action reflecting aggressive nature of fourth-wave and modern environmental movements.
  • in contrast, this wave addressed interconnected social issues: workplace inequality, internet activism, environmental degradation, and broader patriarchal structures underpinning
• BP2 MMFR: 6?


  • decision to turn around represents active resistance, not to save herself and 5, but dismantle Joe's regime
  • Citadel symbolises physical and emblematic domination of natural resources and women
  • Furiosa's liberation highlights intersection of feminist and ecological resistance
  • emphasises need for collective resistance to restore balance in world devastated by patriarchy
• BP2: 7 (link)?


  • Offred's passive defiance underscores complexities of resisting theocracy
  • Furiosa's assertive actions signals urgency of confronting patriarchal and ecological exploitation
  • together, (affirm contention!), exploring the possible consequences of both inaction and rebellion