Causation

    Cards (20)

    • What must be proved in causation?
      The consequence must be proved.
    • What are the two types of causation that must be proved?
      Factual and legal causation.
    • What is the 'but for' test in factual causation?

      The prosecution must show that the consequence would not have happened but for the defendant's conduct. R v pagett
    • What was the outcome of R v White regarding the defendant's actions?
      The defendant was not the cause of death since the mother did not die from the poison.
    • What does legal causation require regarding the defendant's cause?
      The defendant's cause must be 'more than minimal' for the consequence. R v Hughes
    • What is the thin skull rule in legal causation?
      The defendant must take the victim as they find them.
    • In R v Blaue, what unique aspect of the victim affected the outcome?
      The victim was a Jehovah's Witness who refused a blood transfusion.
    • What can break the chain of causation?
      An act of a third party, the victim's own act, or a natural but unpredictable event.
    • What must medical treatment do to break the chain of causation?
      It must be so independent of the defendant's acts that the defendant's acts are insignificant.
    • In R v Jordan, what caused the victim's death after being stabbed?
      An allergic reaction to the wrong antibiotics given by the doctor.
    • In R v Smith, what did the medical staff do that affected the outcome?
      They gave artificial respiration that worsened the injury.
    • What does it mean that the defendant's actions need not be the sole cause of death?
      The defendant's actions just have to contribute significantly to the death.
    • In R v Cheshire, what was the cause of the victim's death after being shot?
      An infection from a tracheotomy performed in the hospital.
    • What does switching off a life support machine do in terms of causation?
      It does not break the chain of causation.
    • What happens if a victim's own act is unexpected and unforeseeable?
      It breaks the chain of causation.
    • In R v Roberts, what did the victim do to escape a situation?
      The victim jumped from a car to escape sexual assault.
    • What are the key elements of causation in law?
      • Causation requires proving the consequence.
      • Factual causation uses the 'but for' test.
      • Legal causation requires the defendant's cause to be 'more than minimal.'
      • The thin skull rule applies to the victim's unique conditions.
      • The chain of causation can be broken by third-party acts, the victim's actions, or natural events.
    • What are the implications of medical treatment on the chain of causation?
      • Medical treatment must be independent of the defendant's actions to break the chain.
      • If the defendant's act is still a substantial cause, improper medical treatment does not break the chain.
    • What is the significance of the cases R v Pagett, R v White, and R v Hughes in causation?
      • R v Pagett: Used a pregnant woman as a shield.
      • R v White: Poison did not cause the mother's death.
      • R v Hughes: Provisional license driver was not at fault for the victim's death.
    • What are the outcomes of R v Jordan and R v Smith regarding medical treatment?
      • R v Jordan: Wrong antibiotics led to the victim's death, breaking the chain.
      • R v Smith: Medical treatment worsened the injury, but the defendant remained guilty.
    See similar decks