too much unpunished crime leads to lack of social order
society becomes unhealthy
potential causes: Government change, economic hardship, disaster
EG. Storming capital after Donald Trump left White House
Erikson (supports Durkheim): Wayward Puritans
content analysis of court records etc
found: communities engaged in public punishment --> hangings, floggings
Now: public condemnation no longer needs to be face to face: over radio/media
Davis (support Durkheim): 'Safety Valve'
committing small acts to prevent serious acts to release aggression/frustration
Prostitution is safety valve for men: hire prostitutes to release built up frustration
less likely to take out frustration on wife
EVALUATION Durkheim: Positive
Crime is good for society + explains reasons for level of crime
crime serves as a useful purpose: Functional rebels (Suffragettes)
Crime can change overtime: stays up to date
EVALUATION Durkheim: Negative
assumes harmony between individuals: ignores struggles in society
MARXISM + FEMINISM: not all criminals are punished equally: class/females treated differently
Durkheim theorises crime is necessary but fails to distinguish between crimes
Doesn't explain why people commit crimes
ignores individual differences/ people circumstances
safety Valve ignores free will
Merton's Strain Theory:
Structural explanation developed on Durkheim's idea of Anomie
crime and deviance is when a cultural goal is more important than normative means (legally doing it)
5 Modes of adaptation: Conformity, Innovation, Ritualism, Retreatist and Rebellion
Conformity: Accept both normative means + cultural goals
Innovation: Reject normative means, accept cultural goals
Ritualism: Accept normative means, reject cultural goals
Retreatist: Reject normative means + cultural goals
Rebellion: Create new normative means and cultural goals
EVALUATIONMerton: Positive
simple explanation of how social structure can lead to crime
other theories expand on the idea
Reiner: time relevant + can be applied to 2011 LONDON RIOTS
can explain why crime rate in W/C is higher --> more difficult for W/C to reach normative means due to poverty/cultural deprivation--> lower social capital
EVALUATIONMerton: Negative
Valier: pluralist perspective --> society is made up of diverse groups with different end goals
Only explains utilitarian crimes (money)
Too simplistic --> individual may fit into multiple modes of adaptation
leaves questions unanswered. How are goals achieved? What factors determine individuals mode? etc
Hirschi Control Theory:
Asks why people commit crimes
argues people commit crimes due to weakened social bonds
strong social bonds: conformist behaviour
weak social bonds: criminal behaviour
social bonds determined by: belief, attachment, commitment, involvement
belief - share moral beliefs
attachment - people feel bonded to each other
commitment - people feel committed to conventional goals
involvement - people feel integrated in society: too busy for crime
EVALUATION Hirschi: Negative
incomplete explanation --> can't answer why some people have stronger bonds than others
Subcultural Theory: Cohen - Status Frustration
W/C males dominate crime rates
due to not doing well in education
higher status unattainable due to cultural deprivation
in response, conform to own norms and values NOT MAINSTREAM