eschatological verification is a theory presented by Hick
Hick claimed 2 things for religious language
its claims are cognitive
they are therefore subject to verification
Parable of the Celestial City
2 men travel together along a road - one believes it leads to a Celestial City, the other believes it leads nowhere
one sees the journey as greatly meaningful, prepared by the king of that city + designed to make him a worthy citizen of the place when he arrives there
the other sees the journey as unavoidable + aimless
when they do turn the last corner, it will be apparent that one of them has been right all the time + the other wrong
Parable of the Celestial City - explanation
while there is no evidence, the beliefs held by either of the men influences the way they encounter + deal with various events along the way
this is meaningful, regardless of whether it is true or false
eventually, at the end of time, it will be shown one way or another
Hick makes the point that there is a truth to know + that it will be revealed after death
strengths:
Hick's claim that heaven is a real possibility
it gives good support to the view that religious claims are cognitive as if we do 'wake up' in a resurrected body, then we shall know that many other claims made by Christianity are ture
the previous point is supported by Hick's claim that whenever we describe an experience, we are at the same time interpreting it
weaknesses (+ counter responses)
Hick's claim about heaven does not make it true or even a strong possibility -> BUT there is evidence for life after death: near-death experiences; memories of reincarnation
view that religious claims are cognitive does not work like standard falsification -> Hick states that statements in mathematics cannot be falsified, as well as claims of atheists about life after death