Cards (4)

    • Biased evidence (-)

      • some believe evidence is biased because researchers are sponsored by drug companies and may selectively publish positive outcomes (Goldacre)
      • Also lack of independent studies of drug effectiveness also research on psychological therapy may be biased
    • Serious side effects (-)
      Although SSRIs help most people, a small minority will get no benefit.
      some people also experience side-effects such as indigestion, blurred vision and loss of sex drive.
      These side-effects are usually temporary, however they can be quite distressing for people and for a minority they are long lasting.
      For those taking the tricyclic clomipramine, side-effects are more common and can be more serious. For example more than 1 in 10 people experience erection problems and weight gain, 1 in 100 become aggressive and experience heart-related problems.
    • Cost effective and non disruptive (+)

      • cheap compared to psychological treatments because many thousands of tablets or liquid doses can be manufactured in the time it takes to conduct one session of a psychological therapy.
      • Using drugs to treat OCD is therefore good value for public health systems like the NHS and represents a good use of limited funds.
      • As compared to psychological therapies, SSRIs are also non-disruptive to people's lives. If you wish you can simply take drugs until your symptoms decline.
    • Effectiveness (-)
      • Skapinakis carried out a systematic review of outcome studies and concluded that both cognitive and behavioural (exposure) therapies were more effective than SSRIs in the treatment of OCD.
    See similar decks