research method in which a researcher asks another individual questions and records the answers they give
structured interviews
the questions are pre-determined and each interviewee is asked the same questions in the same order.
unstructured
free-flowing, open ended conversation in which the overall topic is pre-determined
semi-structured
based on an interview schedule which is a list of general topics to cover in order in the interview.
friedman and rosenman
used interviews to study 3,534 Californian men in their study of the relationship between personality type, resistance to stress and vulnerability to coronary heart disease.
friedman and rosenman- type A personality
highly competitive
always plays to win- hates losing
time pressured/deadline focused
measure success in terms of productivity
multi-tasking
unhappy doing nothing
self critical
hostile to others
hostility bottled up.
friedman and rosenman- type B personality
not competitive
happy just taking part
not time pressured
measure success in terms of happiness
one task at once
happy doing nothing
self accepting
accepting of others
AO3- STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS- ADVANTAGES
-practical- quick to complete and process. easier to analyse- just compare the answers from different interviewees
-requires less training than unstructured interviews
-pre set list of questions ensures no topics or questions are omitted
-less danger of investigator effects
AO3- STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS- DISADVANTAGES
-no opportunity for the researcher to prompt and probs the subject by asking them to elaborate and explain their answers
-often lack depth, detail and ''richness'' in data
-researcher is unable to access any information not revealed by the predetermined questions
-harder for the researcher to develop new hypotheses.
AO3- UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS- ADVANTAGES
-researcher can prompt and probe the subject by asking them to elaborate and explain through follow up questions
-more detailed information can be obtained from each respondent
-researcher can access information not revealed by pre-determined questions
-easier to develop new hypotheses.
AO3- UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS- DISADVANTAGES
-more danger of investigator effects
-requires well trained interviewers= expensive to produce reliable interviews
-less practical- more time consuming
-no pre-set questions- topics can be omitted
AO3- SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
-interview schedule makes it less likely questions or topics will be omitted, data is easy to process and compare
-more scope for the researcher to prompt and probe, therefore more detailed infomation can be obtained- the researcher can access information beyond the pre set questions and the researcher can develop new hypotheses.
questionnaire
data is collected through respondents writing their own answers to a list of pre-set questions.
open questions
respondents can answer in their own words. produce qualitative data
closed questions
closed as the range of possible responses is limited by the researcher. respondent usually ticks a box. closed questions= quantitative data
most questionnaires typically start with closed questions and then move onto open
postal
researcher is not present when a postal questionnaire is completed. respondent completes it and then returns it to the researcher by post or email
face-to-face
researcher is present while respondent completes the questionnaire. questionnaire is then given directly to the researcher.
what is an example of questionnaires?
friedman and rosenmans study of 3,524 californian men on the study of personality type with coronary heart disease.
AO3- ADVANTAGES OF CLOSED QUESTIONNAIRES
practical- quick and cheap to process + analyse - researchercounts how many times a box is ticked.
this enables the researcher to cover a large sample in a short space of time- increasing the populationvalidity of the data, making it more representative of the whole population
AO3- DISADVANTAGES OF CLOSED QUESTIONNAIRES
-closed questionnaires give the respondent a restricted choice of answers and limit the respondents ability to express their opinions.
AO3- ADVANTAGES OF OPEN QUESTIONS
-respondent is not limited to selecting an answer provided by the researcher, and is able to express their opinions
AO3- DISADVANTAGES OF OPEN QUESTIONS
-less practical- longer to process + analyse. researcher has to work through a larger amount of qualitative data.
-makes it difficult to cover a large sample, reducing population validity
AO3- ADVANTAGES OF POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRES
-respondent is under less pressure, due to the absence of a researcher and is more likely to answer honestly, less likelihood of social desirability bias
AO3- DISADVANTAGES OF POSTAL QUESTIONNAIRES
-low response rate:
-waste of resources- time and money
-sample bias- people who respond are either people who have time available to them, or people with strong views on the topic- which is unlikely to be representative of the whole population and will lack population validity
-researcher not present to clarify misunderstandings.
AO3- ADVANTAGES OF FACE-TO-FACE QUESTIONNAIRES
-no problems with low response rates; all questionnaires are completed and returned to the researcher
-researcher is present to clarify misunderstandings.
AO3- DISADVANTAGES OF FACE-TO-FACE QUESTIONNAIRES
-respondent is under more pressure to the the presence of an interviewer and is less likely to answer honestly- greater likelihood of social desirability bias.
AO3- OVERALL ADVANTAGES OF QUESTIONNAIRES
-questionnaires are a practicalmethod, enabling researchers to gather data from a largesample in a short space of time
AO3- OVERALL DISADVANTAGES OF QUESTIONNAIRES
-people may deliberately or unconsciously lie or mislead the researcher- eg- social desirability bias- data will lack internal validity