Defined as any sex chromosome pattern that deviates from the usual XX/XY formation and which tends to be associated with a distinct pattern of physical and psychological symptoms.
Physical characteristics: reduced body hair, breast development, underdeveloped genitals and smallinfertile testes
Psychological characteristics: poorly developed lang skills and poorreadingability, passive + shy, lack interest in sexual activity, and may exhibit problems with memory
Physical characteristics: no menstrual cycle (amenorrhea), infertile, no breasts instead a broad'shield' like chest, lowset ears and 'webbed' neck and physically immature (low hip to waist ratio)
Psychological characteristics: higher than average reading ability, lower than average performance on spatial, visualmemory and maths tasks, socially immature and trouble fitting in and relating.
Studies of people with atypical sex chromosome patterns are useful as they contribute to our understanding of the naturenurture debate.
By comparing people who have these conditions to individuals who are chromosomally-typical it is possible to assess the psychological and behaviouraldifferences between the 2 groups.
It might be logical to infer that these differences are a direct result of the abnormal chromosomal structure and that these differences have a biological basis.
Such conclusions would suggest that innateinfluences have a powerful effect.
However, to leap to this conclusion would be taking a biologicallyreductionist view. - The relationship between chromosomal abnormalities associated with Klinefelter's and Turner's syndrome and the differences seen in behaviour is not causal.
It might be that environmental and socialinfluences may play a role.
For example, the social immaturity seen in females with Turner's syndrome may be a result of the fact that they were treatedimmaturely because they still appear childlike.
Therefore, it would be incorrect to assume that the observed psychological and behavioural differences are purely a product of biology.
Continued research into atypical sex chromosome patterns is likely to lead to earlier and more accurate diagnosis of such disorders as well as increasingpositivefutureoutcomes.
Herihlyetal's (2011) study of 87 individuals with Klinefelter's showed that those who were identified and treated at a young age had significantbenefits compared to those who had been diagnosed in adulthood.
Caution should be taken when drawing conclusions concerning gender development from such an unusual and unrepresentative sample.
As this group of people have atypical chromosomal patterns it is unlikely their gender development is representative of everyone and therefore, findings can be criticised for lackinggeneralisability