universality and bias - psychologists seek universality but bias may be inevitable (as psychologists are products of their time and place)
alpha bias - exaggerates differences, presented as inevitable, tends to devalue females
examples of alpha bias - girls have weaker identification with same-sex parent, so weaker conscience (Freud), boys lack connectedness to mother so less empathy (Chodrow)
beta bias - underestimates differences e.g. when conducting research
examples of beta bias - fight or flight response based on male animals and assumed to be universal, tend and befriend more common in females (Taylor et al.)
androcentrism - leads to alpha or beta bias. normal behaviour is judged from the male standard, e.g. female aggression explained by PMS, male anger seen as rational (Brescoll and Uhlmann)
evaluation of gender bias
biological versus social explanations
sexism in research
gender biased research
good or bad?
biological versus social explanations for gender bias - social stereotypes (girls have better verbal ability, boys have better spacial ability) presented as facts (Maccoby and Jackie)
counterpoint - some stereotypes have a biological basis, e.g. female multitasking explained by hemispheric connections in women (Ingalhalikar et al.)
sexism in research (gender bias) - male researchers more likely (Murphy et al.) and their expectations about women (e.g. expect irrationality) may mean that female participants underperform in studies (Nicolson)
gender biased research (gender bias) - studies of gender bias published less than studies of other biases e.g. ethnicity, taken less seriously (Formanowicz et al)
good or bad? (gender bias) - gender biased research has damaging consequences for women (e.g validates discriminatory practices) but reflexivity may permit more value-free research
universality and bias (cultural bias) - 68% of research participants from US (Henrich et al), 80% are students (Arnett)
WEIRD participants - westernised, educated people from industrialised, rich democracies (Henrich et al)
ethnocentrism - the superiority of own cultural group, others seem as deficient
example of ethnocentrism - ainsworth's attachment types, baby left on own classed as insecure led Japanese babies classed as insecure (Takahashi)
cultural relativism - etic (study behaviour from outside a culture) and emic (from inside) (Berry)
imposed etic - ainsworth's strange situation, definitions of abnormality
evaluation of cultural bias
classic studies
cultural psychology
ethnic stereotyping
relativism versus universality
classic studies (cultural bias) - social influence research, e.g asch findings in individualist US, not replicated in collectivist culture (Smith and Bond)
counterpoint - individualism-collectivism distinction may no longer apply due to increasing global media, no differences in more recent research (taken and osaka)
cultural psychology - studies show how people shape/are shaped by their culture (cohen), epic approach to avoid ethnocentrism, e.g. local researchers and culturally-biased techniques
ethnic stereotyping - early army iq tests were ethnocentric views and highlights social influences, but then used as evidence that certain ethnic/cultural groups were generically inferior (gould)
relativism versus universality (cultural bias) - relativism challenges our ethnocentric views and highlights social influences, but there are universals (e.g emotion and interactional synchrony)
the free will and determinism debate - is our behaviour selected without constraint (free will) or caused by internal or external factors (determinism)?
free will - humans are free to make choices. biological and environmental influences can be rejected, the humanistic appoach
hard determinism (fatalism) - all human action has a cause
soft determinism - people have freedom to make choices within a restricted range of options
determinism - james though scientists should explain the determining forces acting upon us, but we still have freedom to make choices
biological determinism - e.g. influence of ANS on stress response, genes on mental health. mediating influence of the environment is also determinist
environmental determinism - skinner described free will as an 'illusion'. 'choice' is the sum of our total of our reinforcement contingencies
psychic determinism - freud identified drives, instincts and unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood
the scientific emphasis on causal explanations (free will and determinism) - science seeks to explain causes by identifying general laws, the laboratory experiment (like a test tube) allows control over other variables
evaluation of free will and determinism
practical value
research evidence
the law
do we want determinism?
practical value of free will and determinism - adolescents who believed in fatalism more prone to depression, internal locus of control 'healthier' (roberts et al)
research evidence (free will and determinism) - participants asked randomly to flick wrist and say so, brain activity came before (libet et al)
counterpoint - not evidence against free will, delayed conscious awareness still means the person may have made the decision to act
the law (free will and determinism) - hard determinism not consistent with legal principle of moral responsbility
do we want determinism ? - determinism helps psychology be scientific and leads to useful applications, but free will has intuitive appeal (e.g. not feeling your genes determine you
interactionist approach - cannot separate nature and nurture, relative contribution is what matters e.g attachment - parenting (bowlby) versus temperament of child (kagan)
diathesis-stress model - vulnerability and trigger e.g. ocd (inherited gene and trauma)
epigenetics -lifestyle and events (e.g smoking, trauma) switch genes on or off, permanent and can be passed on
nature - nativists argue that human characteristics are determined by heredity, genes determine behaviour in same way as they determine physical characteristics