issues and debates

    Cards (75)

    • universality and bias - psychologists seek universality but bias may be inevitable (as psychologists are products of their time and place)
    • alpha bias - exaggerates differences, presented as inevitable, tends to devalue females
    • examples of alpha bias - girls have weaker identification with same-sex parent, so weaker conscience (Freud), boys lack connectedness to mother so less empathy (Chodrow)
    • beta bias - underestimates differences e.g. when conducting research
    • examples of beta bias - fight or flight response based on male animals and assumed to be universal, tend and befriend more common in females (Taylor et al.)
    • androcentrism - leads to alpha or beta bias. normal behaviour is judged from the male standard, e.g. female aggression explained by PMS, male anger seen as rational (Brescoll and Uhlmann)
    • evaluation of gender bias
      • biological versus social explanations
      • sexism in research
      • gender biased research
      • good or bad?
    • biological versus social explanations for gender bias - social stereotypes (girls have better verbal ability, boys have better spacial ability) presented as facts (Maccoby and Jackie)
      counterpoint - some stereotypes have a biological basis, e.g. female multitasking explained by hemispheric connections in women (Ingalhalikar et al.)
    • sexism in research (gender bias) - male researchers more likely (Murphy et al.) and their expectations about women (e.g. expect irrationality) may mean that female participants underperform in studies (Nicolson)
    • gender biased research (gender bias) - studies of gender bias published less than studies of other biases e.g. ethnicity, taken less seriously (Formanowicz et al)
    • good or bad? (gender bias) - gender biased research has damaging consequences for women (e.g validates discriminatory practices) but reflexivity may permit more value-free research
    • universality and bias (cultural bias) - 68% of research participants from US (Henrich et al), 80% are students (Arnett)
    • WEIRD participants - westernised, educated people from industrialised, rich democracies (Henrich et al)
    • ethnocentrism - the superiority of own cultural group, others seem as deficient
    • example of ethnocentrism - ainsworth's attachment types, baby left on own classed as insecure led Japanese babies classed as insecure (Takahashi)
    • cultural relativism - etic (study behaviour from outside a culture) and emic (from inside) (Berry)
    • imposed etic - ainsworth's strange situation, definitions of abnormality
    • evaluation of cultural bias
      • classic studies
      • cultural psychology
      • ethnic stereotyping
      • relativism versus universality
    • classic studies (cultural bias) - social influence research, e.g asch findings in individualist US, not replicated in collectivist culture (Smith and Bond)
      counterpoint - individualism-collectivism distinction may no longer apply due to increasing global media, no differences in more recent research (taken and osaka)
    • cultural psychology - studies show how people shape/are shaped by their culture (cohen), epic approach to avoid ethnocentrism, e.g. local researchers and culturally-biased techniques
    • ethnic stereotyping - early army iq tests were ethnocentric views and highlights social influences, but then used as evidence that certain ethnic/cultural groups were generically inferior (gould)
    • relativism versus universality (cultural bias) - relativism challenges our ethnocentric views and highlights social influences, but there are universals (e.g emotion and interactional synchrony)
    • the free will and determinism debate - is our behaviour selected without constraint (free will) or caused by internal or external factors (determinism)?
    • free will - humans are free to make choices. biological and environmental influences can be rejected, the humanistic appoach
    • hard determinism (fatalism) - all human action has a cause
    • soft determinism - people have freedom to make choices within a restricted range of options
    • determinism - james though scientists should explain the determining forces acting upon us, but we still have freedom to make choices
    • biological determinism - e.g. influence of ANS on stress response, genes on mental health. mediating influence of the environment is also determinist
    • environmental determinism - skinner described free will as an 'illusion'. 'choice' is the sum of our total of our reinforcement contingencies
    • psychic determinism - freud identified drives, instincts and unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood
    • the scientific emphasis on causal explanations (free will and determinism) - science seeks to explain causes by identifying general laws, the laboratory experiment (like a test tube) allows control over other variables
    • evaluation of free will and determinism
      • practical value
      • research evidence
      • the law
      • do we want determinism?
    • practical value of free will and determinism - adolescents who believed in fatalism more prone to depression, internal locus of control 'healthier' (roberts et al)
    • research evidence (free will and determinism) - participants asked randomly to flick wrist and say so, brain activity came before (libet et al)
      counterpoint - not evidence against free will, delayed conscious awareness still means the person may have made the decision to act
    • the law (free will and determinism) - hard determinism not consistent with legal principle of moral responsbility
    • do we want determinism ? - determinism helps psychology be scientific and leads to useful applications, but free will has intuitive appeal (e.g. not feeling your genes determine you
    • interactionist approach - cannot separate nature and nurture, relative contribution is what matters e.g attachment - parenting (bowlby) versus temperament of child (kagan)
    • diathesis-stress model - vulnerability and trigger e.g. ocd (inherited gene and trauma)
    • epigenetics -lifestyle and events (e.g smoking, trauma) switch genes on or off, permanent and can be passed on
    • nature - nativists argue that human characteristics are determined by heredity, genes determine behaviour in same way as they determine physical characteristics
    See similar decks