eyewitness testimony is EEunreliable as memories are extremely fragile, become easily distorted and therefore reconstructed
misleadinginformation
incorrect information given to the eyewhitness that unintentionally distorts the memory of the original crime
leading questions
a phrased in a way that implies a particular answer and persuades the witness perspective
loftus and palmer
aim: investigation of how leading questions can affects the level of accuracy
procedure:
5 conditions each with a different verb
45 ps watched the film
asked what the speed of the car was
conclusion: leading questions can distort the witness memory of the event
post event discussion
when witnesses speak after the event before being questioned
they can be confused about the source of the information (source monitoring effect)
witness memories become distorted as they believe other eyewitnesses are right and they are wrong (memory conformity effect)
Gabbert et al study
Aim: investigate the effects of post event discussion on accuracy
Method: in pairs that viewed a stimulated crime event on video. It was the same event form different angles, they could see different elements. In the control they could discuss
Results: post even discussion 71%, 0% from no event discussion
Conclusion: exposure to post event discussion distorts the memory through the source monitoring effect.
Standard police interviews
Bombarded with direct close ended questions
Often interrupted
Not allowed to talk freely
Rushed through details
Cognitive interviewer
Minimizing distractions
Actively listening
Open ended questions
Avoid being judgmental
Effective recall
Uses retrieval cues
Report everything
Report every singles detail regarding the incident
context reinstatement
Asked to mentally recreate the environment
Change order
Asked to report the incident in different chronological orders
Change perspective
Asked to Report the incident from different perspective
enhanced cognitive interview
Asking open ended questions
Getting witness to speak slowly
Adapt language to suit the witness
Interviewer should min distractions
Anxiety
State of emotional and physical arousal i response to a stressful situation
Christianson and hubiette
aim- investigate anxiety effect on EWTrecall
procedure- 110 real life witnesses at a bank robbery in Sweden, two different groups had a different level of anxiety depending on proximity. interviews within 4-15 months after the event
results- showed good memories, closer exposure gave a better recall
Johnson and Scott
procedure- lab condition with two conditions. condition one, no weapon, hands covered in grease, talk about equipment failure. condition two, heated argument, held a bloodied letter opener. shown 50 photos to identify the man with
low level make people less likely to recall details becomes of a lack of motivation to pay attention
moderate level make people recall details more accurately because more attention to the details focus increased
high anxiety can make people panic and focus on one thing (weapon) rather than anything else.
Proactiveinterference
Causes forgetting of new infomation due to old infomation
kepple ad underwood
presented with trigrams and asked to recall at different intervals. to prevent rehearsal during time initial ps need to count backwards in threes
results found ps forgot the end trigrams regardless of the time interval
retroactive interference
causes forgetting of old information due to learning new information
McGeoch and McDonald
asked to learn a list of 6 words NT I they could recite perfectly. ps were divided into 6 groups, 5 of them were asked to learn another set. participants were asked to recall from the first list. most forgetting occurred in the Synonyms
Retrieval failure
Known as cue dependent failure, states that we forget due to a lack of cues
encoding specificity principle
memory is most effective when infomation present at the time of encoding is also present at the time of retrieval