Sensory Register temporarily stores information from senses and constantly receives information around us, unless we pay attention to it, it disappears quickly → spontaneous decay.
Context reinstatement and report everything produced the greatest accuracy of recall of correct information, suggesting at least these two elements should be used to improve police interviewing of eyewitnesses even if full CIT isn't used.
Kohnken conducted a meta-analysis by combining data from 50 studies, finding that ECI constantly provided more correct information than the standard interview used by police, suggesting real practical benefits of using ECI, giving police a greater chance at catching and charging criminals, which benefits the rest of society.
Conrad (1964) found that information changed to sound on the way through memory for acoustic errors to occur, otherwise, errors would have been based on appearance.
Psychology students were used as participants in Peterson & Peterson's (1959) study, which may introduce demand characteristics and limit generalisability.
Fisher et al (1989) conducted a study where 16 detectives from Dade County, Florida were trained in cognitive interview and found that 63% more information was gained by detectives trained in CI than those who were not.
Kebbel and Wagstaff argued that only a few hours of training, as is possible for many police forces, is insufficient to adequately train interviewers, especially for the enhanced social understanding required for the enhanced cognitive interview.
Change perspectives in Cognitive Interview involves asking eyewitnesses to recall events from someone else’s perspective, as it avoids the effect of personal expectations and schema disrupting memories.
Reporting everything in Cognitive Interview encourages eyewitnesses to report every single detail, no matter how big or small, as some details can trigger other memories that may be crucial evidence.
Reversing the order in Cognitive Interview causes eyewitnesses to think more carefully about what happened, as it avoids personal expectations of how the event happened being reported and it’s harder to be dishonest when the order of events is reversed.
Context Reinstatement in Cognitive Interview involves asking eyewitnesses to place themselves at the crime scene and ask questions about the environment, such as what was the weather like or how did you feel, to avoid context-dependant forgetting.
Real Life applications of context cues include making an effort to try and recall in the environment first learned, which was used in the cognitive interview.