Cards (40)

  • Giddens (2006): Reflexive self: people do not accept the identities handed down to them by society in a passive manner. process of accepting and rejecting different things society enforce on us
  • Weber: social class influences our life chances; how likely it is that we are going to get the things that are desirable in society
  • objective: factual statements - measures income and level of education which put people into a category irrespective of how they feel of it. independent of how you feel about it
  • subjective: depends on the persons perspectives and opinions. more linked to sense of self identity. we can choose what social class we identity with.
  • Bourdieu: the class habitus - is more subjective. even if you remove money, there are still certain values, actions and tastes that belong to different social classes. (clothing, education etc)
  • culture capital:. the social assets of a person (education, style of dress) that promote social mobility in a society
  • Nouveau riche - people who have money do not have cultural capital, and have no taste like the queen (new rich)
  • conspicuous consumption: the newly rich brag about what they have when born rich people dont brag about it
  • the professionals: upper middle class e.g. university lecturers, professors, doctors, lawyers...
  • middle class e.g. teachers, priests, offices...
  • lawler (2005): middle class try to distinguish themselves from the working class (continued from Bourdieu)
  • working class (traditional): strong sense of community - mining in the UK- male bred winners.
  • working class (new): lost sense of community, it is a job not a career - meant for money and not fulfilment
  • Murray - The new right (underclass) - made up of people that steal instead of actually working for stuff / the underclass is characterized by educational failure, truancy...
  • Jones (the new right): taking the working class and demonizing them - hating on their taste and the way they speak.
  • chav stereotype: reinforces the view that the poor are to blame for their poverty rather than being poor due to structural inequalities
  • identity of uneducated, poor, savage and violent imposed on the poor whether or not it is justified - baseless stereotypes. points to the power of the dominant class to impose this identity
  • clarke and saunders (1991): the social class as a marker of identity - as who am i - has lost importance and has been replaced by other identity markers like religion etc,
  • lash and urry (1987): people lifestyle and consumptions choices are less influenced by their class
  • metanarrative: a big idea we take for granted that helps us make sense of the world e,g, god
  • sociologists say modernity ended in 1950, we are now in post modern times. all about rejection of metanarratives and questions importance of social class/religion
  • social class: a group of people with a similar economic situation
  • upper class: old money - upper class culture
    new money - business men (industrial) and celebrities
  • scott: studied the subculture of the elite
  • scott (1991): military services values, servants and nannies, particular leisure activities such as fox hunting and tennis, they have a taste for high culture, inter marriage, and socialisation occurs in private schools (like prince harry)
  • in middle class it is more connected to the career part than job - work now earn later
  • financial middle class: igaming
  • charlesworth (2000): traditional working class: said that insults are respect and endearment.
  • liberal (left wing): they believe in social freedom, accepting of gay marriage, abortion etc. e.g. graffiti
  • right wing: conservative; dont agree with immigration etc, try to keep things traditional, oppose gender equality e.g. nazis/ hitler
  • Murray: The New Right (underclass):
    • the underclass is characterized by educational failure and truancy, made up of people that steal instead of working hard etc.
    • very conservative
    • unfairly applied to the working class
  • Jones; taking the working class and demonizing them - hating on their taste, weight, speech, alcoholism, teenage pregnancy etc.
  • the chav stereotype; devalues the working class culture as they de-establish themselves from the working class.
    • reinforces the view that the poor are to blame for their poverty rather than being poor due to structural inequalities. (blaming the poor to not blame the rich)
    • the poor; uneducated, rude, savage and violent.
    • baseless stereotypes which label people because they "belong to a certain social group"
    • points to the power of the dominant class to impose this identity -> who decided which tastes/trends are bad/good?
  • Clarke and Saunders (1991): the social class as a marker of identity.
    • "who am i" has lost it's importance
    • replaced by other identity markers e.g. gender, religion, sexuality, ethnicity, and consumption
  • Lash and Urry (1987): the subculture of social classes is not as strong as before, peoples' lifestyles and consumption choices are less influenced by their class
  • post modern times; metanarratives;
    • a big idea we take for granted that helps us make sense of the world around us e.g. gravity, sex, gender, god.. and big things that colour our world
  • modernity ends in the 1950/60s -> today is the post modern.
  • modern period; believed that when we become more rational and logical, we will leave behind superstition and religion, things will become better in society.
  • post modern period; all about the rejection of metanarratives -> question importance of social classes/religion.