Giddens (2006): Reflexive self: people do not accept the identities handed down to them by society in a passive manner. process of accepting and rejecting different things society enforce on us
Weber: social class influences our life chances; how likely it is that we are going to get the things that are desirable in society
objective: factual statements - measures income and level of education which put people into a category irrespective of how they feel of it. independent of how you feel about it
subjective: depends on the persons perspectives and opinions. more linked to sense of self identity. we can choose what social class we identity with.
Bourdieu: the class habitus - is more subjective. even if you remove money, there are still certain values, actions and tastes that belong to different social classes. (clothing, education etc)
culture capital:. the social assets of a person (education, style of dress) that promote social mobility in a society
Nouveau riche - people who have money do not have cultural capital, and have no taste like the queen (new rich)
conspicuous consumption: the newly rich brag about what they have when born rich people dont brag about it
the professionals: upper middle class e.g. university lecturers, professors, doctors, lawyers...
middle class e.g. teachers, priests, offices...
lawler (2005): middle class try to distinguish themselves from the working class (continued from Bourdieu)
working class (traditional): strong sense of community - mining in the UK- male bred winners.
working class (new): lost sense of community, it is a job not a career - meant for money and not fulfilment
Murray - The new right (underclass) - made up of people that steal instead of actually working for stuff / the underclass is characterized by educational failure, truancy...
Jones (the new right): taking the working class and demonizing them - hating on their taste and the way they speak.
chav stereotype: reinforces the view that the poor are to blame for their poverty rather than being poor due to structural inequalities
identity of uneducated, poor, savage and violent imposed on the poor whether or not it is justified - baseless stereotypes. points to the power of the dominant class to impose this identity
clarke and saunders (1991): the social class as a marker of identity - as who am i - has lost importance and has been replaced by other identity markers like religion etc,
lash and urry (1987): people lifestyle and consumptions choices are less influenced by their class
metanarrative: a big idea we take for granted that helps us make sense of the world e,g, god
sociologists say modernity ended in 1950, we are now in post modern times. all about rejection of metanarratives and questions importance of social class/religion
social class: a group of people with a similar economic situation
upper class: old money - upper class culture
new money - business men (industrial) and celebrities
scott: studied the subculture of the elite
scott (1991): military services values, servants and nannies, particular leisure activities such as fox hunting and tennis, they have a taste for high culture, inter marriage, and socialisation occurs in private schools (like prince harry)
in middle class it is more connected to the career part than job - work now earn later
financial middle class: igaming
charlesworth (2000): traditional working class: said that insults are respect and endearment.
liberal (left wing): they believe in social freedom, accepting of gay marriage, abortion etc. e.g. graffiti
right wing: conservative; dont agree with immigration etc, try to keep things traditional, oppose gender equality e.g. nazis/ hitler
Murray: The New Right (underclass):
the underclass is characterized by educational failure and truancy, made up of people that steal instead of working hard etc.
very conservative
unfairly applied to the working class
Jones; taking the working class and demonizing them - hating on their taste, weight, speech, alcoholism, teenage pregnancy etc.
the chav stereotype; devalues the working class culture as they de-establish themselves from the working class.
reinforces the view that the poor are to blame for their poverty rather than being poor due to structural inequalities. (blaming the poor to not blame the rich)
the poor; uneducated, rude, savage and violent.
baseless stereotypes which label people because they "belong to a certain social group"
points to the power of the dominant class to impose this identity -> who decided which tastes/trends are bad/good?
Clarke and Saunders (1991): the social class as a marker of identity.
"who am i" has lost it's importance
replaced by other identity markers e.g. gender, religion, sexuality, ethnicity, and consumption
Lash and Urry (1987): the subculture of social classes is not as strong as before, peoples' lifestyles and consumption choices are less influenced by their class
post modern times; metanarratives;
a big idea we take for granted that helps us make sense of the world around us e.g. gravity, sex, gender, god.. and big things that colour our world
modernity ends in the 1950/60s -> today is the post modern.
modern period; believed that when we become more rational and logical, we will leave behind superstition and religion, things will become better in society.
post modern period; all about the rejection of metanarratives -> question importance of social classes/religion.