interpretation of the sensory info by the brain, in order to make sense of the world around us
sensation
physical stimulation by sense receptors from the environment (e.g. sound waves processed by our ears)
binocular depth cues
cues only detected when both eyes are used
convergence
(binocular depth cue) the closer the object, the harder our eye muscles must work to give our brain info about depth + distance
retinal disparity
(binocular depth cue) the way our left and right eye see slightly different images
monocular depth cues
perceptual cues that can be detected by one eye
height in plane
(monocular depth cue) objects higher up in the visual field appear further away
occlusion
(monocular depth cue) objects that obscure/are in front of others appear closer to us
relative size
(monocular depth cue) smaller objects in the visual field appear further away
linear perspective
(monocular depth cue) lines that are parallel appear to get closer together in the distance
visual cues
visual info from the environment (like movement, distance etc.)
visual constancies
our ability to see an object as the same even if the actual image perceived has changed (e.g. we get closer or move around it)
ambiguity
when some images/stimuli can be perceived in more than one way (e.g. Necker cube)
fiction
when a figure is perceived even though it is not part of the image (e.g. kanizsa triangle)
misinterpreted depth cues
objects in the distance scaled up by the brain to look normal size (visual illusions)
size constancy
brain's ability to perceive familiar objects as the same size, despite changes in the size of the image on the retina
visual illusions
the unconscious 'mistakes' of perception
direct theory
the argument that info from the visual array is all the brain needs to perceive the world - perception is the same as sensation
motion parallax
(monocular depth cue to do with movement) objects that are far away appear to move more slowly compared to objects closer to us
nature
aspects of behaviour that are inherited
constructivist theory
we make sense of the world around us by building our perceptions based on incoming data and clues from what we already know
inference
taking in info and drawing a conclusion about what it means based on what we already know (e.g. someone smiling = they're happy)
nurture
aspects of behaviour that are acquired through experience
perceptual set
tendency to notice certain aspects of the sensory environment whilst ignoring others (effected by culture, mood, motivation, expectation)
culture
our beliefs and expectations that surround us
optic array
everything we can see at any one time
top-down processing
perceiving things based on your prior knowledge and experiences
ponzo illusion
converging lines on the image give the impression of distance, we believe the line on top is bigger, but it is just further away
muller-lyer illusion
outgoing 'fins' are perceived as longer than the line with ingoing 'fins'
neckercube
the cube can be perceived as going upwards, right, left or downwards (it can 'flip' between twointerpretations)
kanizsa triangle
looks as if there is a second white triangle overlapping, illusory contours give the impression that the white triangle has continuous edges
rubin's vase
a black vase and 2 white faces facing each other
the Ames room
the shape of the room gives the illusion one person is much taller than the other - look through the hole in the wall, the room is shaped like a trapezoid but looks like a square
Gibson'sdirecttheory of perception
NATURE - perception is innate
Gregory's constructivist theory of perception
NURTURE - perception is learned through experience
factors affecting perception
culture
emotion
motivation
expectation
perceptual set
the tendency of our brains to notice or prefer certain aspects of the sensory environment