TOPIC 7 - FAMILIES AND SOCIAL POLICY

    Cards (19)

    • The state policys influence family life: CHINA'S ONE CHILD POLICY =
      • Extra benefits provided for those who comply such as: free child healthcare and higher tax allowances
      • if you don't = pay a fine
      • women encouraged to undergo sterilisation after first child
    • State policy influencing family life: Communist Romainia =
      • drove up the birth rate, restricted contraception and abortion,, made divorce difficult
      • charged an extra 5% tax to unmarried and childless couples
    • State policy influence on family life: Nazi Germany = twofold policy
      • encouraged pure reproduction - restricted contraception and abortions
      • sterilised almost 4 hundred thousand disabled people
    • State policy influence on family: Democratic societies =
      • the government doesn't intervene unless something goes wrong e.g child abuse
    • Functionalism view on social policy =
      • believe that the state is acting for the interests of society as a whole (consensus) to help families and make life better e.g =
      • Fletcher - the introduction of health (NHS), education and housing policies - leading to the welfare state
    • Criticisms of the functionalist perspective on social policy:
      • it assumes all members of the family benefit equally - feminists argue the policies benefit men over women
      • it assumes theres a 'march of progress' marxists argue that policies can reverse e.g cutting welfare benefits
    • DONZELOT: Policing the family (conflict) he is interested in the surveillance of families (observing)
      • see social policy as a form of state control - he shows the importance of professional knowledge (doctors, social workers) as a form of the states power and control
      • Donzelot is criticised by Marxists and Feminists for failing to identify who benefits from such policies of surveillance e.g Marxist = capitalist class benefits and Feminist = men benefit over women
    • The New Right perspective on social policy:
      • Changes in family diversity such as increase in divorce and cohabitation threatens the nuclear family producing problems such as crime and welfare dependency
      • The state policy have encouraged these changes e.g ALMOND =
      • laws making divorce easier undermine the idea of marriage
      • intro of same sex marriage, state no longer sees heterosexual as superior
      • Tax laws discriminated conventional families - more tax as dual earners
    • Lone parents, welfare policy & dependency culture:
      MURRY - welfare benefits offer "preserve incentives" (rewarding irresponsible behaviour) e.g teenagers getting pregnant to get free counsel housing or boys growing up without a father role model leading to more crime
      • state social policies are encouraging a dependency culture threatening 2 functions the family fulfils for society 1. successful socialisation of the young and 2. maintenance of work ethic of men
    • The new rights solution =
      • Cuts in welfare spending & tighter restrictions for who is eligible for benefits
      • This means taxes can be reduced, give fathers more work and reduce teenagers becoming pregnant very young
      • support the nuclear family such as taxes that favour married couples
    • Evaluation of the new right:
      Criticisms = Feminists argue that its an attempt to return to traditional patriarchal nuclear family where women are confined to their domestic role
      • it assumes that the nuclear family is natural rather than socially constructed
      • ABBOTT and WALLACE - argue cutting benefits would lead to even greater poverty
    • Conservative Governments 1979-97
      • Thatcher banned homosexuality & the teaching of its acceptance in families
      • conservatives defined divorce as a social problem & set up Child support agency to enforce maintenance payments by absent parents
      • Conservatives introduced measures opposed by the new right such as laws to make divorce easier & giving illegitimate children equal rights
    • New Labour Governments: 1997-2010
      • like new right, they see a family headed by a married heterosexual couple & emphasised the need for parents to take responsibility of their children
      • Silva and Smart, new labour reject the new rights view of one earner and follow dual earner neo-conventional family (Chester) e.g working tax credit (claim on childcare)
      • new labour support same sex relationships, giving unmarried the same support as married
    • Conservative led Governments from 2010
      HAYTON: conservatives are divided into
      1. Modernisers - recognise families are more diverse
      2. Traditionalists - favour new right, diversity is wrong
      conservative coalition government introduced gay marriage
    • Policy as self-fulfilling - the effect of policies reinforce a particular type of family e.g normal families are based on marriage and offers tax incentives to married couples
    • Policies supporting the patriarchal family: Feminist view
      • Tax and benefits policies = assume males are breadwinners, making it hard for wives to claim social security benefits of their own
      • Childcare = school time tables and holidays make it hard for mothers to work full time unless they can afford childcare
      • Care for sick and elderly = middle aged women are expected to do this care, preventing them from working full time
    • Evaluation of the Feminist view:
      • Not all policies are directed at maintaining patriarchy e.g equal pay, sex discrimination laws, the right for lesbians to marry, benefits for lone parents
    • Gender Regimes (DREW) describe how social policies in different countries can encourage or discourage gender equality in family & work
      1. Familistic gender regimes = policies based traditional gender divisions, where males are the breadwinner and females housewife and care
      2. Individualistic gender regimes = policies based on the belief that husbands and wives should be treated equally e.g Sweeden
    • State versus market:
      Drew - European unions are moving towards individualistic gender regimes away from traditional patriarchal family
      but social policies such as publicly funded childcare doesn't come cheap, who should benefit from them
    See similar decks