perry et al

    Cards (14)

    • to investigate how oxytocin affects preferred interpersonal distance for those scoring high or low in empathy traits
      • 54 male undergraduate students
      • from the university of Haifa, Israel
      • 19-32 year olds
      • received course credit/payment
      • laboratory experiment
      • self-report (questionnaire & computersied tasks)
      • independent measures design - randomly allocated
      DV: preferred interpersonal space (%) of remaining distance
      IV: empathy score (high or low), treatment/oxytocin or placebo (saline solution), condition (stanger, authority figure, friend, ball)
    • calculating empathy scores
      • participants take the 'interpersonal reactivity index' test (IRI) and split into two groups based on the scores
      • high empathy = ≥40
      • low empathy = ≤33
      • 20 participants in each (14 participants scored between 33 and 40 - cant determine if they have high or low empathy)
    • treatments
      • double-blind
      • participants took either oxytocin or salt water
      • self-administered 3 drops into each nostril
      • participants waited 45 minutes (for oxytocin to take effect) and completed the IRI during this time
    • experiment 1 - CID task (conditions IV)
      • computerised task (96 trials)
      • shown name of an approaching figure (ball, friend, stranger or authority figure)
      • figure can appear at 1 of 8 entrances around the circle
      • the figure slowly moves towards the middle figure (participant) and participants can press the spacebar to stop the figure
      • calculate the % of space left or remaining distance (DV)
    • experiment 2 - choosing rooms
      • computerised task (168 trials - 86 photo pairs x2)
      • told to pick a room to 'have a conversation with another participant' (doesn't happen)
      • shown animated room pictures with 2 identical chairs, table, plant, closet, lamp and clock (rooms were very similar)
      • each pair, distance between chairs varies 20-140cm apart and angles of chairs varies from , 45°, 90°
      • participant picks the room they would prefer each time
      • DV - mean average preferred chair distance (cm) and mean average preferred chair angle (°)
      • (same IVs but conditions are: chair position vs table position)
    • experiment one results:
      high empathy group
      • oxytocin (23.3) decreased preferred mean distance from the figure compared to placebo (26.1)
      low empathy group
      • oxytocin (30.2) increased preferred mean distance from the figure compared to placebo (26.9)
      experiment two results:
      high empathy group
      • oxytocin (78.1) caused closer chair distances compared to placebo (80.5)
      low empathy group
      • oxytocin (80.1) caused greater chair distances compared to placebo (78.3)
      oxytocin did not affect preferred chair angle
      • oxytocin had an impact on interpersonal distances preferences, depending on individual empathy level
      • oxytocin may only increase closeness in highly empathetic people
    • strengths
      • standardised procedure - CID task timings and figures, same room photos, nasal spray and waiting 45 minutes - high reliability and replicability, consistency
      • high level of control - lab experiment, double blind procedure for nasal spray (avoid researcher bias and demand characteristics), same setting and number of computerised trails - increases internal validity
      • quantitative data - numerical results (%) for itnerpersonal and chair distances comparing placebo and oxytocin conditions - easy to analyse statistically and compare IV levels
    • weakness
      • unrepresentative sample - only males used from Israel, 19-32 year olds - ungeneralisable to women or people from different countries (they may prefer closer interpersonal differences)
      • low ecological validity - artificial setting and computerised tasks (imaginary figures approaching) - low mundane realism, low generalisability (not experience the same discomfort or emotional factors as personal space is affected in real life)
    • + informed consent gained
      + right to withdraw
      + protection from harm (press spacebar to reduce distress)
      • deceived about having a meeting in experiment two
      • intrusions into personal space may have caused distress (even when animated)
      • deception about treatments? - double blind
      • applications to everyday life: used to help people with social problems (eg. autistic people), administer oxytoic to help them feel more empathy
      • nature-nurture: environment affected interpersonal distance; people have different empathy levels
      • individual-situational: oxytocin changed behaviour; individual empathy level affected interpersonal distance
      1. interpersonal distance: the distance between two people
      2. personal space: an area with invisible boundaries, surrounding a person's body, which intruders may not cross
      3. empathy: a person's ability to understand the thoughts, feelings and experiences of another
      4. social hormones: hormones involved in social behaviour
    See similar decks