told to pick a room to 'have a conversation with another participant' (doesn't happen)
shown animated room pictures with 2 identical chairs, table, plant, closet, lamp and clock (rooms were very similar)
each pair, distance between chairs varies 20-140cm apart and angles of chairs varies from 0°, 45°, 90°
participant picks the room they would prefer each time
DV - mean average preferred chair distance (cm) and mean average preferred chair angle (°)
(same IVs but conditions are: chair position vs table position)
experiment one results:
high empathy group
oxytocin (23.3) decreased preferred mean distance from the figure compared to placebo (26.1)
low empathy group
oxytocin (30.2) increased preferred mean distance from the figure compared to placebo (26.9)
experiment two results:
high empathy group
oxytocin (78.1) caused closer chair distances compared to placebo (80.5)
low empathy group
oxytocin (80.1) caused greater chair distances compared to placebo (78.3)
oxytocin did not affect preferred chair angle
oxytocin had an impact on interpersonal distances preferences, depending on individual empathylevel
oxytocin may only increase closeness in highly empathetic people
strengths
standardised procedure - CID task timings and figures, same room photos, nasal spray and waiting 45 minutes - high reliability and replicability, consistency
high level of control - lab experiment, double blind procedure for nasal spray (avoid researcher bias and demand characteristics), same setting and number of computerised trails - increases internal validity
quantitative data - numerical results (%) for itnerpersonal and chair distances comparing placebo and oxytocin conditions - easy to analyse statistically and compare IV levels
weakness
unrepresentative sample - only males used from Israel, 19-32 year olds - ungeneralisable to women or people from different countries (they may prefer closer interpersonal differences)
low ecological validity - artificial setting and computerised tasks (imaginary figures approaching) - low mundane realism, low generalisability (not experience the same discomfort or emotional factors as personal space is affected in real life)
+ informed consent gained
+ right to withdraw
+ protection from harm (press spacebar to reduce distress)
deceived about having a meeting in experiment two
intrusions into personal space may have caused distress (even when animated)
deception about treatments? - double blind
applications to everyday life: used to help people with social problems (eg. autistic people), administer oxytoic to help them feel more empathy
nature-nurture: environment affected interpersonal distance; people have different empathy levels