Different forms of governance and societal structures would evolve as a result of the dialectical movement, ultimately leading to the ideal state where individual freedom and ethical life could be harmonized.
Some critics contend that Hegel's teleological view of history, with an ultimate goal or endpoint, is overly deterministic and does not account for the complexity and unpredictability of historical development.
Critics argue that Hegel's emphasis on the state as an all-encompassing entity might lead to a powerful state that suppresses individual freedoms and rights.
Hegel's state upholds the principle of universality, meaning that laws are applied equally to all citizens, irrespective of their social status or background.
For Hegel, true freedom is not simply the absence of external constraints but the ability of individuals to act in accordance with rational, ethical principles.