Study carried out in the families' homes and most of the observation done by parents. This means behaviour if babies is not affected by the presence of others. Babies behaved naturally - high validity
Same children followed up and observed regularly : longitudinal studies have thus, good internal validity as they do not have confounding variables of participant variables
All families were from same social class and location and time of 50 years ago meaning results do not generalise well to other social/historical contexts
Evidence cannot be relied on as babies are so young that they are generally immobile and have poor co-ordination so there is not much observable behaviour
Not clear when children become capable of multiple attachments. Bowlby suggested most if not all babies form As to a specific carer before being capable of multiple As
Bowlby stated children have play mates as well as A figures and may get distressed when the play mate leaves the room. Problem for Schaffer and Emerson as observation does not leave us a way to distinguish a way of behaviour shown towards secondary A figures and play mates
Schaffer and Emerson used limited behavioural measures of attachment
Carried out scientific study of attachment development because they used simple behaviours like separation and stranger anxiety to define attachment. Some critics believe these are too crude