Improving the accuracy of EWT: cognitive interview

    Cards (14)

    • Describe how there is research supporting The Cognitive Interview:
      supports that the ECI may offer special benefits(Kohnken et al 1999)
      • a meta analysis which combined data from 50 studies
      • the CI consistently provided more correct information
      • indicates that there are real practical benefits to the police (greater chance of catching and charging criminals )
    • Why are some elements of the Cognitive Interview being more valuable than others a strength?
      (Milne and Bull 2002)
      • found that each technique was valuable ( each produced more information)
      • found that a combination of report everything and context reinstatement produced better recall than all of the other conditions
      • suggests that at least these two elements should be used to improve police interviewing, even if the CI isn’t used
      • increases the credibility
    • 2 strengths of cognitive interview
      • Some elements of may be more reliable than others
      • Support for the effectiveness of the ECI
    • How does the Cognitive interview have little practical value?
      • too time consuming since more time is needed to establish rapport with the witness
      • taking longer than the standered police interview
      • Keble and Wagstaff argued that only a few hours of training is insufficient to adequately train interviewer.
      • forces may be reluctant and unimpressed with the CI as it takes up more time
    • 1 limitation of the cognitive interview
      May have little practical value
    • What is the enhanced cognitive interview?
      (Fisher et al)
      • additional elements to the CI to focus on the social dynamic of the interaction
      • Interviewer needs to know when to make eye contact
      • includes ideas such as reducing anxiety, minimising distraction, open ended questions
    • Who developed the enchanted cognitive interview (ECI)?
      Fisher et al
    • Describe the cognitive interview technique, Change perspective.
      • Recall from another persons perspective
      • Disrupt the effect of expectations and schema recall.
      • the schema you have for a particular setting generates expectations, the schema is recalled rather than what is actually happening
    • Describe the cognitive interview technique, Reverse the order.
      • Recall the events in a different order to the original
      • Prevents people from their expectations
      • Prevents dishonestly
    • Describe the cognitive interview technique, Reinstate the context.
      • imagine the environment and their emotions
      • related to context
      • dependant forgetting
    • Describe the cognitive interview technique, Report everything.
      Encouraged to include every single detail of the event ( even if it seems irrelevant)
    • What are Fisher and Gesieleman’s (1992) 4 main cognitive interview techniques?
      1. Report everything
      2. Reinstate the context
      3. Reverse the order
      4. Change the perspective
    • Who argued that EWT could be improved if the police used better techniques?
      Ronald fisher and Edward Gesieleman (1992)
    • What is a cognitive interview?
      A method of interviewing eyewitnesses to help them retrieve more accurate memories
    See similar decks