Estimating parameters in inferential statistics involves taking a statistic from your sample data, such as the sample mean, and using it to say something about a population parameter, such as the population mean.
Hypothesis tests in inferential statistics use sample data to answer research questions, for example, whether a new cancer drug is effective or if breakfast helps children perform better in schools.
A research hypothesis is a formal statement or expectation about the outcome of a study, usually cast in terms of the dependent and independent variables, and needs to be concise and testable.
Non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis tests imply that participants will perform differently, meaning there would be an effect but you do not know what direction the effect would be.
Numerous inferential tests are available, the selection of which depends on the shape of the distribution, the assumption of normality made, the study design (repeated measures or between subjects), and the type of data (interval/ratio; ordinal; nominal [frequencies]).
In single sample designs, a measurement is taken from the sample (e.g., test score, reaction times, etc) and then compared to the population measurements.
Single sample tests, either a z test or a t-test, are used to find out if the sample is/is not different (i.e., is/is not representative) of the population.
If the test outcome is significant, it paves the way for further exploration as to why our sample might be different (i.e., not representative of) to the population.
Hypothesis testing allows us to accept one of the following statements: the sample is representative of the population, in which case there is no significant difference in weights of babies born to mothers who have substance abuse problems, compared to those who do not, or the sample is not representative of the population, in which case there is a significant difference in weights of babies born to mothers who have substance abuse problems, compared to those who do not.
A one-tailed hypothesis predicts a specific direction of outcome, such as babies born to substance abuse mothers will weigh less than the national average.
A two-tailed hypothesis does not predict a specific direction of outcome, simply stating that there will be a difference, such as weights of babies born to substance abuse mothers will not be the same as the national average.
A one-tailed hypothesis is usually used in situations where there is a compelling reason for doing so, such as when there is considerable previous evidence supporting a 1-tailed hypothesis or a one-tailed hypothesis is strongly supported by theory.
For example, when testing a new drug supposed to improve patient health, a one-tailed hypothesis is more appropriate, as not merely looking for a difference, but the difference must be in the right direction.
Null hypothesis (for info only not needed unless stated otherwise): the sample mean is equal to the population mean. Hence, the sample is representative of the population.
Experimental (2-tailed) hypothesis: the sample mean is not equal to the population mean. Hence, the sample is not representative of the population.
Alpha level (or the significance level) of a test reflects how stringent the testing criteria are.
There are two commonly used alpha levels: 0.05 (for 95% level of significance) and 0.01 (for 99% level of significance) - the latter is more stringent.