History teaches a certain skeptical mindset and the need to bridge the gap between scholarship and public policy.
Historians should act responsibly with a clear sense of the limits of the possible.
Historians must communicate their thinking to a wider audience to shape opinion and offer possible analogies with past patterns of behavior.
The book "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000" by Kennedy discusses the relationship between economic change and military conflict.
States have both individual interests and shared interests with other states.
The interaction between states, the causes of war, crisis management, and peace-making are the principal focus of international history.
International history did not establish itself as the most important field in the historical profession
Historians such as Webster, Lewis Namier, and Harold Temperley gained a deeper understanding of the importance of history through their involvement in intelligence and military matters during the war.
Arms races have their own historical dynamic and can have significant political consequences.
Historical scholarship cannot predict the future
Later generations in Britain used the term "international history" to signify interest in broader historical patterns, including financial ties
Pierre Renouvin and Egmont Zechlin were international historians who were maimed in World War I and represented French and German scholarship.
Temperley acknowledged that G.M. Trevelyan's appointment meant the end of hopes for Modern and Diplomatic History on the Regius Chair
Harold Temperley served in War Office intelligence and later became head of MI2E, dealing with the political side of problems of the peace settlement.
International history has faced challenges and criticism, with contested methods
Foreign policy is historically important and reveals the operations of the political system
History is vulnerable to attempts to exploit it for present needs
Post-modernity seeks to dissolve history and liberate from the coercive idea of reality and truth
Perceptions of policy-makers can distort information and are decisive in decision-making.
The external and domestic spheres of politics are inseparable.
The dream of individual liberation has turned into a perpetual nightmare of a senseless and demystified present.
International history needs to be understood in both international and national contexts.
Ignoring the singularity of the past reduces it to a priori answers and fails to recognize its unique, irreversible, and unrepeatable nature.
The aggressive foreign policy of the Electors of the Palatinate had internal, ideological, and religious roots.
Policy-making is often ragged, haphazard, and inconsistent.
Reducing grand narratives to decontextualized stories renders the differences caused by the passage of time insignificant.
There is no guarantee that the public or politicians will listen to historical advice
A generation is defined by a collective consciousness of common formative experiences.
Considering the past merely a construct fails to appreciate the constructed nature of one's own thinking.
There is a danger of self-indulgent reification in gendered approaches and in applying the idea of 'otherness' or 'alterity' to South Eastern Europe
Diplomatic history is the study of the history of international relations through the documents of diplomats.