reliability

    Cards (10)

    • Reliability is a measure of consistency
    • In psychology, researchers want to ensure that measures are consistent between participants and over time
    • Test-Retest Reliability:
      • Same person or group of people undertake the research measure on different occasions
      • Important to be aware of potential demand characteristics
      • Correlate the scores from the two occasions to determine reliability
    • Inter-Observer Reliability:
      • Refers to the consistency of two or more observers in observing and recording behavior
      • Useful in situations where subjectivity is a risk
      • Important in psychology studies with applied behavioral categories, so they are used in the correct way
    • Improving Reliability: Questionnaires
      • Identify questions impacting reliability and adjust them
      • Rewrite questions to reduce misinterpretation
      • Change open questions to closed questions to limit ambiguity
    • Improving Reliability: Experiments
      • Control over variables influences reliability
      • Laboratory experiments have high reliability due to control over independent variables, making them easier ot replicate by following standardised procedures
      • Take more control over extraneous variables to improve reliabilityand prevent them from become confounding
    • Improving Reliability: Observations
      • Observations rely on researcher's interpretations, important they are being objective and not subjective
      • Operationalize behavioral categories to improve reliability, clear and specific on what consititues the behavior
      • Categories should be clear and specific with no overlap, and no room for personal interpretation
    • if the correltation is shown to be signifation then ath meaure is deemed ot have agood reliability, a perfect correlations is 1, but +0.8 is a good indication of relaibility
    • in observer- reliability the psychologist would obseverce the same sitution or event seperately and then theri observation (scores) would be correlated ot see if they are relaible.
    • Improving reliability : interviews
      • ensure same interviewer for all interviews to reduce researcher bias, a different reseachers can pose questions differently which can lead to different answers
      • if same interviewer cannot be used, then another should be trained to reduce bias
      • also changeing interview from unstructued to structed reduces researcher bias
    See similar decks