Does the religious concept of the sanctity of life have any meaning in 21st century medical ethics?
medical science can help decide when sanctity of life is no longer a factor
keeping the body alive when they are gone is inhumane
SoL fails to accomadate new medical technologies
doctors find it hard to predict when death is
need social taboos to protect life
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - to affirm all lives not just the rich and powerful
Should a person have complete autonomy over their own life and the decisions made about it?
Autonomy is an important idea to philosophers as it links to the idea of moral responsibility and the capability to make moral decisions
life ends beyond the individual - time to be born and a time to die - to try an hold autonomy over death flies in the face of reality that it most instances we do not have the option to die
how is it a free decision if we are presented with our own suffering -- often overwhelming people -- not helpful with autonomy
allows desperate people to make desperate decisions
what about the freedom of others - enable others to loose their life
freedom is an illusion that our choices make impact others
Is there a moral difference between medical intervention to end a patients life and medical non-intervention to end a patients life?
face the possibility that if they are suffering they may be resuscitated
Emphysema - air becomes trapped in these spaces of damage lungs -- may wish to be resuscitated
this is different from introducinglethal injection
acting to take a life is different from taking the actions to kill someone