Ethics and Science Inquiry

    Cards (33)

    • Ethical Guidelines
      codes of practice designed as a guide to people involved in psychological research.
    • Protection from harm
      must protect physical and psychological wellbeing of participant
    • Informed consent
      Necessity to obtain written consent from participants.
    • Withdrawal rights
      whereby participants can end participation at any time with no pressure or penalty.
    • Confidentiality
      information collected from participants to be stored in a secure manner and disposed of when no longer needed.
    • Difference between confidentiality and privacy
      Confidentiality: HOW information collected from participants is safeguarded
      Privacy: WHAT information is collected from participants
    • Voluntary participation
      participants joins an experiment because they chose to do so
    • Deception
      lying to participants about the true nature of a study and their role in it.
    • Debriefing
      an explanation given to participants at the conclusion of the study
    • Population
      entire group of people that is of interest to a researcher
    • Sample
      a subsection of the population
    • Sampling
      process of selecting participants from a population of research that will be used in a study.
    • Convenience sampling
      participants who are easily accessible are selected.
    • Strengths of convenience sampling
      Easy and doesn’t require a lot of time and effort with little cost needed.
    • Limitations of convenience sampling
      High level of researcher bias due to subjectively selecting participants
      Unlikely to be representative of the population
    • Snowball sampling
      Initial participants are chosen. Each participants encourages to contact researcher to join the sample.
    • Strengths of snowball sampling
      allows research to access difficult recruit due to nature of the study e.g drug users. Less time is needed to gather sample
    • Limitations of snowball effect
      unlikely to be representative of the population because researchers are minimally involved in the recruitment. Sample can be biased with direct contact from the original participants recruited.
    • Random sampling
      Names are collected and randomly drawing them out by using hat or computer generated program e.g spinning wheel.
    • Strengths of random sampling
      Researcher bias is minimised. Participants have an equal chance of being selected to be part of the sample.
    • Limitations of random sampling
      Time and effort required. Sample is unlikely to be representative of population if sample size is not adequate.
    • Stratified sampling
      Population broken down to sub-groups based on characteristic. Participants from each sub-group is randomly selected in the same proportion they appear in the population.
    • Strength of stratified sampling
      likely to be representative of the population. researcher bias is minimised.
    • Limitations of stratified sampling
      Time and effort required and researchers not able to classify each participants into a sub-group.
    • Independent variable
      variable being manipulated by experimenter to observe the effect of the dependent variable.
    • Dependent variable
      variable being measured by experimenter
    • Controlled variable
      variables that stayed consistent during the experiment
    • Extraneous variable
      unwanted variables that may impact the dependent variable.
    • Any extraneous variables that the researcher controls turns into controlled variable.
    • Types of extraneous variables
      1. Participant variables,
      2. Environment variables
      3. Researcher variables
    • Participant variables
      relating to individual characteristics of participants. making sure researchers select sample with similar characteristics e.g age, gender, motivation, intellegence
    • Environment variables
      the environment the study takes place in. e.g testing venue, background noise and time of the day.
    • Researcher variables
      relating to researcher’s personal characteristics and conduct that impacts participants response e.g the accent, attractiveness and age
    See similar decks