ethological explanations

Subdecks (1)

Cards (21)

  • what is ethology?
    • study of animal behaviour in their natural settings
    • we learn about human psychology from studying other animals
  • what is an innate releasing mechanism?
    • hard wired brain networks
    • that respond to specific stimuli from environment
    • by initiating set sequence of behaviours - including aggression
  • what did lorenz say?
    • levels of aggression will build up continually in all animals until theres an opportunity for a release
  • what are fixed action patterns?
    • sequences of innate behaviour that are often performed in a seemingly fixed & stereotypical manner of all members of a species
  • 6 main features to describe nature of how FAP work?
    1. universal
    2. stereotyped
    3. a specific response to identifiable sign stimulus
    4. ballistic
    5. unaffected by learning
    6. situation specific
  • what is universal?
    • all members of species display it
  • what is stereotyped?
    • relatively unchanging & behaviours follow same pattern each time
  • what is ballistic?
    • once triggered it follows an inevitable course & cannot be altered
  • what is unaffected by learning?
    • all animals in that species seem to be born with it & not learnt - INNATE
  • what is situation specific?
    • ritual only occurs in specific circumstance & not in another
  • why are FAPs adaptive?
    • enhance our chances of survival & reproductive success
  • 2 * of ethological explanations?
    1. evidence to support from cooper
    2. empirical evidence to support
  • 2 X of ethological explanations?
    1. ungeneralisable
    2. may not actually be looking at aggression
  • * evidence to support from cooper?
    • researched into aggression in vipers
    • found that all of them when they have bitten their prey they use chemical signal to help them locate body later
    • all viper species have FAP for aggression
    • so they can locate body later & enhance chances of survival as they can eat & survive
  • * empirical evidence from tinbergen?
    • male stickleback fish responds to stimuli of red underbelly with set sequence of behaviours - being aggressive
    • tinbergen presented wooden models of different shapes to make stickleback fish
    • found no matter shape/how realistic it looked fish would attack if it had red spot on underbelly
    • if model did not have red spot - not attacked
    • fish have FAP as they only attack those with red underbelly (sign stimulus) can see they are males
    • environment is under threat (situation specific)
    • more chance of passing genes if theyre ballistic
  • X ungeneralisable?
    • research does not lead to much in terms of conclusions that we can generalise to humans
    • we do share common ancestor but evolved quantitatively & qualitatively - different brains to animals studied
    • we have society/culture & rules/regulations to live by which prevent aggression
    • explanation suggests behaviour is universal within species
    • humans respond differently to certain situations
    • ? population
    • humans dont all have same FAP for same stimulus
    • so cant be said that same FAP for aggression occurs in all humans
    • cannot generalise
  • X may not actually be looking at aggression?
    • most research in this area measures aggression as killing/injuring another creature
    • may be just predatory behaviour & doing it to survive to get food - not with aggressive intent
    • animals cannot communicate how they feel
    • IRM & FAP may not be about aggressive behaviour & actually about survival
    • due to lack of communication with animal species difficult to determine motive for these behaviours
    • means aggression in other non human species could be for different reasons