The person, supposedly chosen by God, who was the most important of all people in the country. He controlled lots of land which he gave to his supporters. His job was to defend the country from attack and make sure people were protected by laws.
They were the King's main supporters and advisors. The king gave them land and in return they provided soldiers to help the king and helped maintain law and order.
Medieval people were very religious, the Church was very important because it offered people the chance to go to Heaven when they died. Each village had a priest and everyone in the Village had to go to Church. The Church had its own courts to put Church workers on trial, the Church building was also used by criminals claiming sanctuary. The Church's power meant that it sometimes ended up fighting with the King.
Most people were peasants, they worked as farmers on the land owned by the local lord. Peasants worked on their own land as well so they could feed their families. There was no police force, so local communities were expected to look after each other and ensure law and order was kept.
There was no police in Saxon England. Every male over the age of 12 was expected to join a 'tithing'. A 'tithing' was a group of 10 men who were each responsible for everyonelse's behavior. If one of them broke the law, the other members of the tithing had to bring him to court, or pay a fine.
If a crime was committed the victim was expected to raise the 'hue and cry'. The entire village had to stop whatever they were doing and join in the hunt to catch the criminal. If a person did not join the 'hue and cry' then the whole village would be fined.
1. A) The accused and the victim would each give their version of what happened.
2. B) If the jury could not tell who was telling the truth, or if there was not enough evidence (i.e an eyewitness) then they would decide based on their knowledge of the people concerned.
3. If they decided the victim was more trustworthy than the accused, they would find the accused guilty and swear an oath of compurgation.
The 'wergild' was a system of fines for different crimes used by the Saxons. Each crime had a specific fine. The system was designed to make further violence less likely (unlike the blood feud which was all about retribution).
The Wergild system was not a fair one though, as more powerful members of society were protected by higher fines (killing a nobleman = 300 shillings, killing a freeman = 100 shillings).
If the 'hue and cry' failed to catch the criminal then the local Sheriff would be informed. He would gather a group of able bodied men who would go out and hunt for the criminal.
Angry Saxons whose homes and property were destroyed by the Normans took the law into their own hands. William introduced a new law which said that if a Norman was murdered, all the people in that region had to pay an expensive fine.
The Normans introduced Church courts. These were separate courts which were used for churchmen and tended to be more lenient (there was no capital punishment).
Many ordinary people were prepared to break the Forest laws, this is what historians call a 'social crime'. The local community were prepared to turn a blind eye to people collecting firewood or hunting in the King's forests (poaching) because they thought the Forest Laws were very unfair.
The Church claimed the right to try an churchman accused of a crime in its own courts. Church courts often dealt with 'moral offences' such as failing to go to Church, drunkeness, adultery, and playing football on a Sunday.
If a person was accused of a crime they were allowed to claim the right to be tried in a Church court (where the punishments were less severe). This should have meant only priests however others would often use it. You had to prove you worked for the church by reading out a passage from the bible.
If a criminal on the run from the law could reach a Church, he or she could claim sanctuary. Once inside the Church the criminal was under the Church's protection and could not be arrested.
The Church ended trial by ordeal in 1215. It was seen as unreliable as it was possible that some guilty men and women could escape punishment whilst others were wrongly found guilty.