Actions are right if they tend to produce happiness and wrong if they tend to produce pain
Introduction
1. Discuss the moral theory of Utilitarianism
2. Look at basic principles of utilitarianism
3. Evaluate morality of individual and societal moral decisions
4. Learn Bentham's act-utilitarianism and Mill's rule-utilitarianism
5. Examine criticisms against utilitarianism
6. Evaluate moral situations based on utilitarianism's principles
Jeremy Bentham was born in Houndsditch, London, England, in 1748
Jeremy Bentham learned Latin and Greek at the age of four and completed his bachelor's and master's degree at Queen's College, Oxford
Utilitarianism was founded in the 18th century and is still considered one of the most influential moral theories
Learning Outcomes
1. Define utilitarianism and distinguish between Bentham and Mill's versions, particularly act and rule utilitarianism
2. Examine criticisms on utilitarianism
3. Evaluate strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism
4. Apply utilitarianism in analysing moral issues in daily life or society
Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are introduced in the chapter on utilitarianism
Bentham equates utility with happiness or pleasure
Utilitarianism
Consequences and Happiness as the Bases of Morality
Bentham's principle of utility states that actions are judged based on their tendency to augment or diminish the happiness of the party involved
Jeremy Bentham advocated for equal rights of women, animal rights, abolition of slavery, physical punishment, and the death penalty
Maximizing happiness means calculating the consequences of actions and choosing the action that produces the greatest happiness
Bentham contends that the right thing to do is to choose the action that will make everyone affected by the action happier than its alternative
Nobody in their normal state of mind wants to experience pain for pain's sake
For Bentham, utility or happiness is the main criterion by which we should judge whether an action is right or wrong
For Bentham, happiness should be the ultimate criterion of morality
Philosophers such as Epicurus, Aristotle, and Socrates have identified happiness as the motivation and end of human actions
Bentham argues that we ought to maximize happiness and choose actions that produce greater happiness
Socrates believes that when we act, we do so with the hope that it will make us happy
Utility is what produces happiness or pleasure and what prevents pain or unhappiness
Bentham uses the hedonic calculus to measure the total amount of happiness based on seven factors: intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity, fecundity, purity, and extent
These philosophers regard happiness as an intrinsic human desire and believe that we all love pleasure and abhor pain
Utility
Property in any object that tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness, or to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness
The hedonic calculus measures the quantity of happiness by evaluating each possible action in view of factors like intensity, duration, certainty, and extent
Epicurus believes that the good life consists in the life of pleasure, free from any form of physical and bodily pain
Jeremy Bentham: '"When a man attempts to combat the principle of utility, it is with reasons drawn, without his being aware of it, from the very principle itself"'
Utilitarianism involves calculating pain over pleasure to make decisions based on maximizing happiness
Intensity of action
The more intense the action, the better it is
Bentham's Classic Act-Utilitarianism requires performing hedonistic calculations for each possible action in every particular situation
Duration of happiness
The longer the happiness lasts, the better it is
Extent of people affected by an action
An action that makes more people happy than unhappy must be preferred
Certainty of action
The more certain an action is to produce happiness, the better it is
Bentham argues that the maximization of happiness is the ultimate principle by which we judge the morality of an action
Classic act-utilitarianism considers every single action as unique and requires unique calculation based on the possible results of particular actions
Act-utilitarianism needs no rules or norms to be taken into consideration in the calculation, as in the case of rule-utilitarianism
Act-utilitarianism involves a crude calculation of pain and happiness
Objections to Bentham's Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is concerned with the direct consequence of an action
Consider the case of lying
Its rightness or wrongness depends on its results
Utilitarianism lacks the moral force to condemn actions that are considered intrinsically wrong, regardless of the amount of happiness they produce