More conservative view examining factors leading to an individual becoming a victim of crime
Focuses on individual factors, relationships between offenders and victims, and ways in which the victim may have contributed to becoming a victim themselves
Critics of Hindelang et al have accused them of relying upon stereotypes in their construction of victims rather than examining what motivates criminals to attack these people
Throughout the 1980s, judges in the UK passed comments on the nature of women's behaviors and how they were dressed, suggesting that these behaviors had meant that the criminal was tempted into crime
Common criticism of positivist victimology is that it is a victim-blaming approach and implies that certain acceptable standards of moral behavior have been breached by the victim causing them to be attacked
Positivist victimology approach is based upon subjective judgments presented as facts, which can be a danger when approaching issues such as being a victim of crime in a quantitative manner
This approach identifies certain patterns of interpersonal victimisation but ignores wider structural factors influencing victimisation, such as poverty and patriarchy
It ignores situations where victims are unaware of their victimisation, as with some crimes against the environment, and where harm is done but no law broken