Bowlby argued long term deprivation from attachment figure could be harmful, he produced his maternal deprivation hypothesis
Deprivation from main carer during critical period will have harmful effects of child's emotional, social, intellectual and physical development
Long-term effects of deprivation may include separation anxiety. Leads to behaviour problems such as avoiding school. Future relationships may be affected
Bowlby (1944), 44 thieves study, Method
Case studies completed on background of the 44 teens
Stealing
Control group of 44 emotionally disturbed teens who hadn't been caughtstealing
Bowlby (1944), 44 thieves study, Findings
17 of thieves experienced frequent separations from mother before age of 2 (it was 2 in the control group)
14 of thieves described as affectionless psychopaths (12/14 experienced separation from mother)
Bowlby (1944), 44 thieves study, Conclusion
Deprivation of child from its main carer in early life can have very harmfullong-termconsequences
Bowlby (1944), 44 thieves study, Evaluation
Link between deprivation and criminal behaviour
Can't make a cause and effect
Detailed but relied on retrospective data (unreliable)
Strengths of Bowlby maternal deprivation hypothesis
Other evidence supporting claims
Goldfarb found orphanage children socially and maternally deprived were less socially developed
Weaknesses of Bowlby maternal deprivation hypothesis
Linked behaviour to deprivation but other things not considered