social influence = the ways external social factors alter our behaviour
NSI and ISI may not be completely exclusive, as suggested by Deutsch and Gerrard's 'Two Process Model'
It may be more beneficial to look at NSI and ISI as complementary, as opposed to mutually exclusive mechanisms
Asch's study
123 male American undergraduates in groups of 6; consisting of 1 true participant and 5 confederates
Participants and confederates were presented with 4 lines; 3 comparison lines and 1 standard line
Confederates would give the same incorrect answer for 12 out of 18 trials
Asch observed how often the participant would give the same incorrect answer as the confederates versus the correct answer
Group size
An individual is more likely to conform when in a larger group
Unanimity of majority
An individual is more likely to conform when the group is unanimous i.e. all give the same answer, as opposed to them all giving different answers
Task difficulty
An individual is more likely to conform when the task is difficult
Zimbardo's study
24 American male undergraduate students
Participants were randomly issued one of two roles; guard or prisoner
Guards began to harass and torment prisoners in harsh and aggressive ways
Prisoners would only talk about prison issues and snitch on other prisoners to the guards
Agentic state
When a person believes that someone else will take responsibility for their own actions
Agentic shift
When a person shifts from an autonomous state (the state in which a person believes they will take responsibility for their own actions) to the agentic state
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate
Expert authority
The authority of the experimenter in Milgram's study, who was seen as legitimate as he was a scientist and therefore likely to be knowledgeable and responsible
Agentic state
When people believe they are acting on behalf of an authority figure, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions
Legitimacy of authority
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as morally good/right, and legitimate (i.e. legally based or law abiding)
Students are more likely to listen to their parents or teachers than other unknown adults
Expert authority
When the authority figure is seen as knowledgeable and responsible, like a scientist
The study suffered from demand characteristics and lacked ecological validity
The sample only consisted of American male students, so the findings cannot be generalised to other genders and cultures
There was a lack of fully informed consent due to the deception required
Participants were not protected from stress, anxiety, emotional distress and embarrassment
Proximity
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter was in the same room (62.5%) compared to being in a different room (20.5%)
Location
Participants obeyed more when the study was conducted at a prestigious university
Uniform
Participants obeyed more when the experimenter wore a lab coat
Demand characteristics were particularly evident in the uniform condition
Authoritarian personality
Belief that people should completely obey or submit to their authority figures, and suppress their own beliefs
Fixed cognitive style
Tendency to adopt absolutist/'black and white' thinking and not challenge stereotypes
Scapegoating
Displacing anger with parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
The F-scale used to measure authoritarian personality is susceptible to acquiescence bias
Adorno's psychodynamic theory
A person's personality traits and attitudes as an adult stemmed from childhood influences such as that of one's parents
Scapegoating
Child with overly harsh and disciplinarian parents displaces their anger with their parents onto seemingly 'inferior' others
On a surface level, the child would idolise their parents, but on an unconscious level, they would fear and despise them, and so arises the need to displace such anger
The child would be more likely to target their displaced anger on those who seem weak and unable to defend themselves, such as minority groups
Reaction formation
The process where the child displaces their anger onto seemingly 'inferior' others
The F-scale is particularly susceptible to acquiscence bias, which describes the phenomenon of respondents always responding in the same way using the scales provided, regardless of the content shown in the scales
The Authoritarian Personality may not be able to explain all cases of obedience across the whole political spectrum, because it technically measures the likeness between an individual to Fascism (far-right on the political scale), but left-wing authoritarianism is also present, such as Bolshevism, and has been ignored by the current theory
There are more similarities between the two ends of these spectrums than differences, most notably a large emphasis on utmost respect for legitimate authority, which suggests that Fascist-like views can be found across the whole spectrum, which the Authoritarian Personality does not account for
The Authoritarian Personality has little ecological validity because it cannot explain many real-life examples of mass obedience, such as the whole German population during Nazi occupation, who likely shared the same struggles in life and displaced their fear about the future onto a perceived 'inferior' group of people, through the process of scapegoating
Locus of control
A measurement of an individual's sense of control over their lives, i.e to what extent they feel that events in their lives are under their own personal control, versus under the control of other external powers like fate
Internal locus of control
People with more of an internal locus of control conform and obey less, because they take more responsibility for their own actions and see themselves as having more control than someone with a high external locus of control, and so are more likely to make decisions based on their own moral code, as opposed to someone else's
External locus of control
People with an external locus of control believe that the majority of their life events are beyond their control, which means that they are more likely to act on behalf of another (i.e. as their agent) and shift responsibility onto this individual, making them particularly susceptible towards obedience