When a person shifts from an autonomous state (the state in which a person believes they will take responsibility for their own actions) to the agentic state
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as credible in terms of being morally good/right, and legitimate
The authority of the experimenter in Milgram's study, who was seen as legitimate as he was a scientist and therefore likely to be knowledgeable and responsible
How credible the figure of authority is. People are more likely to obey them if they are seen as morally good/right, and legitimate (i.e. legally based or law abiding)
On a surface level, the child would idolise their parents, but on an unconscious level, they would fear and despise them, and so arises the need to displace such anger
The F-scale is particularly susceptible to acquiscence bias, which describes the phenomenon of respondents always responding in the same way using the scales provided, regardless of the content shown in the scales
The Authoritarian Personality may not be able to explain all cases of obedience across the whole political spectrum, because it technically measures the likeness between an individual to Fascism (far-right on the political scale), but left-wing authoritarianism is also present, such as Bolshevism, and has been ignored by the current theory
There are more similarities between the two ends of these spectrums than differences, most notably a large emphasis on utmost respect for legitimate authority, which suggests that Fascist-like views can be found across the whole spectrum, which the Authoritarian Personality does not account for
The Authoritarian Personality has little ecological validity because it cannot explain many real-life examples of mass obedience, such as the whole German population during Nazi occupation, who likely shared the same struggles in life and displaced their fear about the future onto a perceived 'inferior' group of people, through the process of scapegoating
A measurement of an individual's sense of control over their lives, i.e to what extent they feel that events in their lives are under their own personal control, versus under the control of other external powers like fate
People with more of an internal locus of control conform and obey less, because they take more responsibility for their own actions and see themselves as having more control than someone with a high external locus of control, and so are more likely to make decisions based on their own moral code, as opposed to someone else's
People with an external locus of control believe that the majority of their life events are beyond their control, which means that they are more likely to act on behalf of another (i.e. as their agent) and shift responsibility onto this individual, making them particularly susceptible towards obedience