-takes place when our behaviours are reinforced or punished
- negative reinforcement- an individual produces behaviour that avoids something unpleasant
- when a person with a phobia avoids a phobic stimulus they escape the anxiety they would have experienced, this reduction in fear negatively reinforces the avoidance behaviour and the phobia is maintained
One strength of the behavioural approach to explain phobias
- the two process model has real-world application
- the idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance is important in explaining why people benefit from exposure therapies such as systematic desensitisation.
- One avoidance behaviour is prevented , it stops being reinforced by the reduction of anxiety, avoidance behaviour therefore declines
- this shows the value of the two process approach because it identifies a means of treating phobias
- Buck suggested that safety is a greater motivator for avoidance behaviour, rather than simply avoiding the anxiety associated with the phobic stimulus.
-For example, he uses the example of social anxiety phobias - such sufferers can venture out into public but only with a trusted friend, despite still being exposed to hundreds of strangers which would usually trigger their anxiety.
- This means that Mowrer's explanation of phobias may be incomplete and only suited for some.
- the therapy aims to gradually reduce phobic anxiety through gradual exposure to the phobic stimulus. - It relies upon the principle of counterconditioning i.e. learning a new response to the phobic stimulus i.e. one of relaxation rather than panic. - This works due to reciprocal inhibition i.e. it's impossible to be both relaxed and anxious at the same time so one emotion prevents the other
- Gilroy et al 2003 followed up 42 people who had SD from spider phobia. At follow-up the SD group were less fearful than a control group as they had reduces symptoms
- this shows that SD is likely to be helpful to those with phobias
- SD is suitable for many patients including those with learning disabilities
- many alternatives to SD are unsuitable for people with learning disabilities such as cognitive therapies which require a high level of rational thought
- SD on the other hand does not require understanding or engagement on a cognitive level and is not a traumatic experience like flooding may be.
- this means that SD is a more appropriate treatment for some people
- a behavioural therapy designed to reduce phobic anxiety through immediate exposure to the phobic stimulus without a gradual build up
- Without the option of avoidance behaviour the person quickly earns that the phobic stimulus is harmless through the exhaustion of their fear response, this is known as extinction
- Flooding is not unethical but it is an unpleasant experience so it is important that people being treated give informed consent. They must be fully prepared and know what to expect
- There are ethical concerns about knowingly causing stress, offset by informed consent and the traumatic nature of flooding also leads to higher attrition rated than SD
- This suggests that overall therapists may avoid using this treatment