LTM is minutes to years and could potentially last a lifetime
It is difficult to test exact duration of LTM
Bahrick did a study on LTM
Bahrick aimed to establish the existence of very long-term memory (VLTM) to see whether there was any difference between recognition and recall
Bahrick procedure involved investigators tracking down graduates from a particular high-school in America over a 50 year period
Bahrick showed the graduates photos from their high school yearbook and the graduates were split into 2 groups - the recognition group and the recall group
The recognition group in Bahrick's study were given a group of names for each photo and were asked to select the name that matched the person in the photo
The recall group in Bahrick's study were asked to name the people in the photos without being given a list of possible names
Bahrick found that in the recognition group the answers given were:
ninety% correct after fourteen years
eighty% correct after twenty five years
sixty% correct after forty seven years
Bahrick found that in the recall group the answers given were:
sixty% accurate after seven years
less than twenty% accurate after fortyseven years
Bahrick's conclusion was that people can remember certain types of information for almost a lifetime
Bahrick's conclusion was the very long-term memory appears to be better when measured by recognition tests than by recall tests
Bahrick's study had high levels of mundane realism. people asked to remember old friends or pictures, therefore his study is externally valid
Bahrick's study was a lab study, participants will have displayed demand characteristics, so there is low internal validity
Baddeley's aim was to explore the effects of acoustic and semantic coding in LTM
In baddeleys study on LTM participants were divided into 4 groups and shown a list of 10 words drawn from 4 catagories
Just like in Baddeley's STM procedures, Baddeley had the same 4 categories to learn about coding
One of Baddeley's categories is acoustically similar words (man, mad, map)
One of Baddeley's categories is acoustically dissimilar words (pen, day, few)
One of Baddeley's categories is semanticallysimilar words (great, big, large)
One of Baddeley's categories is semanticallydissimilar words (hot, old, late)
In Baddeley's study, after an interval of 20 minutes, during which the participants were given another task to do, they were asked to recall the 10 words they had heard in the correct order
Baddeley found that recall in LTM was much worse for semantically similar words than semanticallydissimilar words
Baddeley found that recall was the same for acoustically similar and acousticallydissimilar words in his LTM study
Baddeley concluded that LTM primarily makes use of semantic coding, as shown by the difficulties participants had recalling the correct order of words that had similar meanings