the creation of a better society is separate from subjective values about what is 'best', and shared an enlightenment view that sociology was a science tasked with uncovering the laws of how society works
scientific sociology would reveal the one correct society free from personal opinions
comte - sociology is the queen of sciences
karl marx
while there is debate about whether karl marx was positivist, he saw himself as a scientist and believed that historical analysis could reveal the development of human society - the evolution through capitalism to communism
marx's sociology revealed the truth of that development so takes for granted the value of the ideal communist society
similar to comte and durkheim he views science as helping to deliver the good society
max weber
in contrast to marx, durkheim and comte, weber makes a distinction between value judgements and facts, which he suggests we can't distinguish between
divorcees may be at higher risk of suicide but that doesn't mean we should make divorce harder to obtain, or that people should have every right to die by suicide
no value judgements are proven fact as they can be neither proven or disproven
however they do have some use in sociology, which weber illustrates in stages
stages of research and values
weber - values should be present in some parts of research but not others ~
guiding research - our values help us decide what is important and so what we decide to study
data collection and hypothesis testing - values should be absent in this process as it is scientific and may bias our research
interpretting data - we need a value framework to set the findings in, but we have to be explicit about what values we use
sociologists as citizens - researchers should take moral responsibility for their results and the harm it may cause eg. einstein and the nuke