Formulated from existing theories and serves as the foundation of the study
Conceptual framework
Derived from a combination of theories or parts of theories and guides the researcher in synthesizing the different theories used in formulating a new one
Theoretical framework is more suitable for student researchers than the conceptual framework because of the former's simpler approach
Elements of the Theoretical Framework
Relevant theories
Review of related literature
Review of related studies
Paradigm of the Study (Research Paradigm)
Developing the Theoretical Framework
1. Examine thesis title and research problem
2. Brainstorm about key variables
3. Review related literature and studies
4. List the constructs and variables
5. Review key theories
6. Discuss the assumptions or propositions
Theory
A non-observable construct that is inferred from observable facts and events that are thought to have an effect on the phenomenon under the study and is primarily concerned with determining cause-effect relationships among variables
Parts mentioned in the discussion of relevant theories
Name/s of the authors
Title/s of their theory/ theories
Theoretical statement or principles
Explanation of the theoretical statement
Relationship of the theory to the present study
Conceptual framework
Illustrates what the researcher expects to find through their research and is founded on the theoretical framework
Common Paradigms used in Research
IPO (input-process-output) model
Independent-Dependent Variable Model
Independent-Moderating-Dependent Model
Independent-Mediating-Dependent Model
Independent-Control-Dependent
Moderator
Alters the effect that an independent variable has on a dependent variable
Mediator
Links the independent and dependent variables, allowing the relationship between them to be better explained
It's important not to confuse moderators and mediators
Control variable
Variables that are held constant so that they don't interfere with the results
A literature review creates a "landscape" for the reader, giving them a full understanding of the developments in the field
The review of related studies serves as the basis of the analysis of results because it allows the researcher to compare and contrast their findings with those of past studies
Similarities of related studies
Variables
Methodology
Findings
Conclusions
Thework
Identifies new ways
Helps in solving conflicts
Identifies areas
Points to another research
The review of related studies is an essential part of the planning and research stage of the study
Determining if the research is objective and empirically-based entails the surveying of previous studies that involve similar variables
The review of the related studies serves as the basis of the analysis of results because it allows the researcher to compare and contrast his or her findings with those of past studies
The results of a study are verified by similar findings or negated by different findings from other researchers
The gathered studies are related to the present study when they have the following similarities: 1) They use the same variables, sub-variables, concepts or construct, 2) They have the same subject or topic
Even if a previous research used the same variables as his or her study, the two studies may vary in the delimitation of the sub-variables investigated or in terms of focus and purpose
Data that must be included in writing a review of a related study
Introduction: Rationale of the topic (background)
Body (related studies): 2a. The name of the author, the date, and the setting of the study, 2b. Title of the study, 2c. The salient findings, 2d. The similarity and gaps of the studies to your present study
Conclusion: The implications of the related studies to your present study