Normative theory, a teleological consequentialist theory that evaluates the morality of an action based on its consequences, aiming to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people
Focuses on following rules that, in general, are likely to lead to the greatest good for the greatest number, rather than evaluating each action individually
Avoids the problems of act utilitarianism by using reasonable rules applicable to everyone, encourages thinking about long-term consequences, and addresses the issue of special relationships
A consequentialist ethical theory where the morality of an action is determined by its consequences, specifically how much it increases overall happiness/pleasure and decreases overall suffering/pain
The first form of utilitarianism, invented by Jeremy Bentham, which states that the morality of an action is determined by how much it increases overall happiness/pleasure and decreases overall suffering/pain
A list of seven criteria which each measure a different aspect of the pleasurable consequences of an action, to determine which action will result in the greater amount of pleasure
Higher pleasures are gained from mental activity (e.g. poetry, reading, philosophy, music) and are superior to lower pleasures gained from bodily activity (e.g. food, sex, drugs)
Mill claimed that higher pleasures are of greater quality than lower pleasures, and that "competent judges" (people with experience of both) always prefer higher pleasures
An attempt to improve on Bentham's by using "secondary principles" (general rules and guidelines) that are the product of our civilisation's current best attempt to understand how to produce happiness, while still allowing for direct appeals to the "first principle" of utility when secondary principles conflict
Problems with calculation - knowing the future consequences, making complex calculations, and objectively measuring subjective mental states like pleasure and pain
An action is right regarding "the tendency which it appears to have" to maximise happiness, based on how similar actions have tended to turn out in the past
We only need to know the secondary principles that our civilisation has judged to be those best conducive to happiness, and simply follow those principles as best we can
Utilitarianism could never say 'X is wrong' or 'X is right', only that 'X is right/wrong if it leads to/doesn't lead to the greatest happiness for the greatest number'
If 10 people gained happiness from torturing one person, a Utilitarian would have to say that was morally right as it led to the greatest happiness for the greatest number
If the best action we can possibly do is not one which enables everyone to be happy, the logic of Bentham's theory would justify the sacrifice of the well-being or even deliberate infliction of pain on some minority for the sake of the pleasure of the majority
It's questionable whether Mill's harm principle really is what would make people happiest, as individuals are not in the best position to figure out and follow through on what will make them happy
The issue with secular society is that people have become selfishly focused on their own happiness, which can be argued to be the result of Mill's liberalism and his utopian belief that individuals best know how to make themselves happy