Melzoff and Moore (1977) discovered that infants aged two to three weeks displayed a tendency to mimic adults’ facial expressions and hand movements, indicating that mimicking is an innate ability that helps in the formation of attachment.
Condon and Sander (1974) - videotaped interaction between adult and child providing evidence of interactional synchrony as babies move in time with conversation.
evaluation of caregiver-infant interactions strength
Many studies use multiple observers blind to the true aims of the experiment providing inter-rater reliability. The use of cameras to document and slow down micro sequences provides high inter rater reliability.
limitation of caregiver-infant interactions in humans (unscientific)
Infants cannot directly communicate their thoughts and emotions. Therefore finding in caregiver-infant interactions research depend on assumptions which can be considered to be unscientific
social sensitivity in caregiver infant interactions
Social sensitivity is a concern when investigating child rearing techniques including normality surrounding caregiver-infant interactions. Furthermore the mother could go back to work affecting the attachment of the child.
limitation of caregiver-infant interactions (observational methods)
Problem with research using observational methods is it can lead to observational bias. Koepke et al (1983) failed to replicate Meltzoff and Moore suggesting unreliable results.
Asocial - 0-6 weeks babies display innate behaviours (smiling/crying) and similar behaviour to non-objects and humans therefore no preference for individual caregiver
Indiscriminate - 6 weeks to 7 months infants develops a preference for people and show a preference for people seen frequently however no strong preference
Specific attachment - 7 months babies form a strong attachment to primary caregiver most often mother. Stranger anxiety and separation anxiety develop.
limitation of stages of attachment (conflicting research)
conflicting research into multiple attachments. Some psychologists suggest babies form an attachment to a single caregiver before multiple.(Bowlby 1969)
Others working in more cultural contexts believe babies for multiple attachments from outset. Limiting stages of attachment and therefore validity.
-drawing conclusions from asocial stage is problematic as babies have poor coordination and mobility therefore it is difficult to make judgments based on observation weakening the methodology as evidence isn't as reliable due to limited judgement of behaviour
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) - conducted a longitudinal observation of 60 working class babies from Glasgow asking mothers about protests the babies made in seven everyday separations. It was found that separation anxiety occured in 50% of babies by 25-32 weeks with stranger anxiety starting a month later. By 40 weeks 80% of babies had specific attachments and 30% had multiple attachments.
longitudinal so babies were observed regularly opposed to quickly observing different children. High internal validity as there are no confounding or pps variables.
Low population validity as the sample were all in the same location and class not taking into account other child rearing culture decreasing generalizability of the study.
what did Schaffer find about fathers role in attachment
Schaffer (1964) found that a 75% of children formed an attachment to their father showing separation anxiety suggesting fathers play an important role in their lives
Grossman et al (2002) - longitudinal study into parents' behaviours and relationship quality of attachment with baby in later life. Findings suggested that fathers play a play+stimulation role.
what is a more recent contridiction of fathers role
Primary caregiver - men take on this role their interactional style changes to be more similar to a mothers - increases capacity of sensitive responsiveness.
what research suggests that fathers can be primary caregivers
Field et al (1978) filmed face to face interactions with primary caregiver mother and father and secondary fathers. Both primary caregivers spent more time smiling and imitating baby highlighting reciprocity and interactional synchrony suggesting fathers can be primary attachment figures
strength of the practical applications of role of the father
Practical applications into research of biologically differences therefore men aren't equipped innately (Hrdy 1999) can be applied to provide support for men and therefore take a more practical role in their child's development
There is mixed research into the role of the father Distinct role as playmate (grossman et al 2002) + (Geiger 1996) conflicted with Field (1978) focusing on the father as a primary caregiver
limitation of role of the father (social sensitivity)
Socially sensitive research due to differences in families as mothers and fathers have different 'roles' potentially putting children at disadvantage. Influence socioeconomic factors
Lorenz (1935) tested imprinting to see if animals imprinted with the first subject met visually.
Procedure+Findings : Classic experiment randomly divided up geese eggs into 2 groups (one with mother and one in incubator). The control group imprinted on mother and incubator imprinted on Lorenz. Lorenz determined a critical period of 32 hours for imprinting otherwise ability is lost.
Harlow (1958) tested the 'cupboard love theory' that babies love their mothers because they provide food.
Procedure- laboratory experiment the monkeys were placed in cages with surrogate mothers (wire containing milk and cloth without milk).
Results- monkeys preferred the comfort of the cloth monkey and only used wire to feed. Monkey's grew up to become socially and emotionally disturbed due to maternal deprivation.
Harlow's research helped understand mother-infant attachment. In the sense that attachment does not just develop due to being fed therefore, the importance of a quality early attachment contradicts the learning theory
Lorenz research cannot be generalisable to humans as birds and humans have different attachment styles therefore decreasing the population validity of the study. This is the same for Harlow's research.
Lorenz observations can be seen as questionable due to Guton et al (1966) where chickens imprint on yellow gloves and try to mate with them. However they learnt to mate with other chickens highlighting the decrease in external validity in Lorenz findings
Ethical issues with Harlow's study as monkeys were placed in a stressful environment and later showed signs of psychological harm. They're social animals so it is also unfair to force them into isolation which also decreased the ecological validity of the experiment as the environment was unfamiliar.