some philosophists argue that we can never have definite knowledge of what the world outside our mind is really like
philosophy
husserl - the world only makes sense because we impose meaning on it by constructing mental categories that file information coming from our senses
we only obtain knowledge about the world through our mental acts
typifications
schutz' phenomenological sociology - shared categories that allow is to organise experiences into a shared world of meaning
the meaning of an experience varies with context, so meanings are potentially unstable and unclear
typifications allow us all to agree on the meanings of things and so stabilise these meanings
members of society have a shared lifeworld including shared assumptions about the way things are etc. - recipe knowledge that can be followed without much effort
this knowledge is the world around us
the natural attitude
schutz' phenomonological sociology - the assumption that the natural world is a solid object that exists
in reality this is simply the people involved all sharing the same meanings which allows us to cooperate and achieve goals
HOWEVER berger + luckmann - once society has been constructed it takes on a life of its own and becomes an external reality
religious ideas begin in our consciousness but become embodied in powerful structures eg. churches which constrain our behaviour