garfinkel - a theory stemming from phenomenology that similiarly rejects the idea that society is a real objective structure, and is interested in how social order is achieved
social order is an accomplishment that members of society actively construct using commonsense knowledge
interested in the methods used to produce meanings in the first place
indexicality and reflexivity
garfinkel - indexicality is the idea that nothing has a fixed meaning and everything depends on context, which is a threat to social order as it means communication and cooperation may become difficult or break down
this creates a paradox as we do in reality take things for granted, which can be explained by reflexivity
reflexivity - the use of commonsense knowledge in everyday interactions to create a sense of meaning and prevent indexicality, similar to schutz' idea of typifications
language
garfinkel - language is incredibly important in achieving reflexivity as when we describe something we simultaneously create it by providing reality and removing uncertainty
language is the epitome of a construction of shared meanings
experiments in disrupting social order
garfinkel - performed breaching experiments to demonstrate social order
eg. acted as lodgers in their own homes and haggled in supermarkets
parents became confused, anxious or angry
shows how orderliness isn't inevitable but accomplished by people who take part in everyday situations
suicide and reflexivity
garfinkel - humans constantly strive to impose order through determining patterns, which is what coroners do when ruling a death as suicide
when faced with future cases that mirror past suicides the coroner interprets them as examples of the assumed pattern eg. 'they were mentally ill so they died by suicide'
by cases being classified due to fitting the pattern the pattern seems to be reinforced
evaluation
draws attention to how order is constructed HOWEVER
craib - the findings are trivial and only uncover findings that are already widely known eg. in phone calls one person talks at a time
if theories identify patterns and allocates phenomena to them that must also be the case for ethnomethodology so there is no reason to take it seriously
denies the existence of wider society but analyses general norms
ignores how wider structures of power and inequality affect the construction of meanings